Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 4;97(1):236–246. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex300

Table 2.

The effect of different second stage cultures on two-stage fermented feed physiological characteristics1 (Trial 1).

Control Fermented feed2 SEM P-value
BBC BLC BLA BLA15 BLD BLR24
pH wet 6.42a 5.03b 4.46d 4.86c 4.85c 4.89c 4.82c 0.03 <0.0001
dry 6.42a 4.99b 4.53d 4.91b,c 4.90b,c 4.91b,c 4.89c 0.03 <0.0001
Total lactic acid bacteria, log cfu/g feed wet 3.65e 8.90a,b 8.28d 9.00a 8.57c 8.79b 8.45c,d 0.06 <0.0001
dry 3.65c 8.75a <5.00 5.81b <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 0.02 <0.0001

1Data are means of 3 batches of each feed, each batch was tested in triplicate.

2BBC: fermented feed cultures were Bacillus subtilis var. natto N21 (BS) and Bacillus coagulans L12; BLC: fermented feed cultures were BS and Lactobacillus case; BLA fermented feed cultures were BS and Lactobacillus acidophilus; BLA15: fermented feed cultures were BS and Lactobacillus acidophilus L15; BLD: fermented feed cultures were BS and Lactobacillus delbruekckii; BLR24: fermented feed cultures were BS and Lactobacillus reuteri P24.

a–eMeans in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).