Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 5;35(2):473–485. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx305

Table 2.

GUS in COLD and ALTITUDE Populations Were Statistically Tested for Containing HG or CAG.

Population HG/HGG HG/GUS RR P value CAG/HGG CAG/GUS RR P value
COLD
 Native Americans 3,800/20,479 3/17 0.77 1.00 1,377/20,479 7/17 6.12 6.7×10−5
 Inuit 3,800/20,479 1/8 0.55 1.00 1,377/20,479 4/8 7.44 1.0×10−3
 Eskimos (Siberia) 3,800/20,479 7/41 0.75 1.00 1,377/20,479 6/41 2.18 5.5×10−2
 All 3,800/20,479 10/61 0.72 0.664 1,377/20,479 13/61 4.71 5.9×10−6
ALTITUDE
 Amhara 3,800/20,479 16/113 0.62 0.297 1,377/20,479 9/113 1.18 0.570
 Oromi 3,800/20,479 7/45 0.68 0.704 1,377/20,479 7/45 2.31 3.0×10−2
 Andeans-Tibetans 3,800/20,479 18/76 1.04 0.251 1,377/20,479 20/76 3.91 1.3×10−11
 All 3,800/20,479 41/223 0.81 0.948 1,377/20,479 36/223 2.27 1.5×10−7

Note.—Results show significant enrichment of genes under selection with cancer associated genes but no with housekeeping genes (Fisher’s exact test was used for counts <10). HG, housekeeping genes; GUS, genes under selection; CAG, cancer-associated genes; HGG, human genome genes; RR, risk ratio.

Italic P values indicate statistical significance.