Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 29;97(3):920–929. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex390

Table 7.

Effect phytase and myo-inositol supplementation on concentration of InsP isomers in and InsP6 disappearance up to the terminal ileum of broiler chickens on d 22.1

InsP3x2 Ins(1,5,6)P3 Ins(1,2,3,4)P4 Ins(1,2,5,6)P4 Ins(1,2,3,4,6)P5 Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P5 Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P5 InsP6 InsP6 disappearance
Treatment μmol/g DM %
C 1.1b n.d.3 1.0a,b 2.2d 0.7a 3.3b 1.4a 30.0a 31c
C+MI 1.4b n.d. 1.2a 2.8c,d 0.7a 3.9a 1.6a 30.1a 28c
Phy500 2.3a <LOQ4 0.9b 5.2a 0.2b 3.7a,b 1.1b 13.4b 70b
Phy1500 2.7a n.d. 0.2c 4.2a,b n.d. 0.8c 0.3c 3.3c 93a
Phy3000 2.5a n.d. n.d. 3.8b,c n.d. 0.6c 0.2c 2.8c 94a
Pooled SEM 0.28 - 0.07 0.41 0.04 0.22 0.09 1.29 2.7
P-value <0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

1Data are given as treatment means; n = 8 pens.

2At least one of the following isomers: Ins(1,2,6)P3, Ins(1,4,5)P3, Ins(2,4,5)P3.

3n.d., not detectable in the majority of samples.

4<LOQ, not quantifiable in the majority of samples.

a–dMeans within a column not showing a common superscript differ (P < 0.05).