Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 28;34(11):2970–2981. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx186

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Inferred migration rates under different sampling conditions. The plot shows the distribution of mean inferred migration rates using ESCO, MASCO, and SISCO. From the left, the first distribution of a color (indicating the different methods) always shows the distribution of mean inferred migration rates from state 1 to state 2. The second distribution from the same color shows the rates from state 2 to 1. From left to right the number of samples from state 1 and state 2 are changed, whereas from top to bottom the true symmetric migration rates are going from 1 to 0.01. The lines within the violin plots indicate the first, second, and third quantiles. The coalescent rates were 2 in both states and the migration rates ranged from 0.01 to 1. The migration rates were always symmetric, that is, the same in both directions. The leaves were sampled uniformly between t = 0 and t = 25. Each simulation was repeated 100 times and each inference was run with 3 parallel MCMC chains, each with different initial values. An exponential prior distribution with the mean =1 was used on the migration and coalescent rates.