Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 6;35(3):734–742. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx308

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Ratio of substitution rates estimated with stationary model over substitution rates estimated with nonstationary model. Sequences were simulated with changing G + C content and ω=0.1. Left: dN. Right: dS. θroot: G + C frequency in the root sequence. θeq: G + C equilibrium frequency of the simulation model.