Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 13;18:347. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5237-8

Table 3.

PEACH™ QLD implementation challenges and strategies

Implementation challenge Strategies utilised to respond to implementation challenge Resulting change
Interim Review Phase 1: Responding to contractual changes and preparing for pilot. Interim Review Phase 2: Responding to up-scaling for retention and engagement and preparing for state-wide roll out. Interim Review Phase 3: Responding to access and equity.
Engagement of the health system and ownership of the health issue • Stakeholder engagement to align with key health reform policies and strategies in Qld.
• Mapped workforce.
• Targeted service providers versus individual health professionals.
• Designed flexible program delivery model.
• Developed standardised Service Agreements.
• Consulted Governance Committees to develop cost modelling for program delivery.
• Kept abreast of political landscape.
• Issued EOI to engage service organisations to deliver the program.
• Engaged early adopters in the primary health care sector to increase diversity of health care settings.
• Lobbied for the project to continue with the change in government in 2014 and demise of Commonwealth prevention funds.
• Kept abreast of political landscape.
• Issued EOI to engage service organisations to deliver the program.
• Advocacy work at Departmental level to endorse the program.
• Mobilised strategic advocacy for the program via stakeholder presentations.
• Linked with other large scale community-based programs to leverage opportunities.
• Promoted program adaptations to encourage uptake from the health sector.
• Requirement of Implementation Team to be flexible and adaptable.
• Increased communications with Funding Body to leverage sustainability options.
Recruitment of families and promotion • Modified targets and milestone dates to align with implementation design.
• Created PEACH™ QLD branding and marketing collateral.
• Appointed dedicated marketing position.
• Established enrolment processes and central intake functions to streamline enrolment.
• Accessed demographic and prevalence data to map and profile Queensland to support likelihood of enrolments.
• Devised geographical wave approach to implement the program state-wide.
• Created database to capture program enquiries to inform future marketing.
• Deployed additional marketing strategies in regional and rural Queensland to reach the target audience and reduce stigma in small towns.
• Modified marketing collateral to reflect changes in program design.
• Strategically targeted rural areas to run the program to extend reach.
• Monitored and adapted marketing and recruitment activities for different regions and holiday periods.
• Initiated qualitative research looking at parents’ perspectives on factors influencing their decision to enrol [29]
• Trialled removal of weight criteria in four small communities.
• Developed and launched PEACH™ Online to increase reach to families who could not access face-to-face groups.
• Implemented online marketing strategy targeting regional and rural Queensland to promote PEACH™ Online.
• Removed weight criteria.
• Modified marketing collateral to reflect changes in eligibility criteria.
• Investment in marketing strategies which were driving enrolments.
• Changes to eligibility criteria and enrolment milestone targets:
  ➢ Original eligibility criteria from 7 to 13 years to 5 to 11 years (aligning with typical ages of primary school in Qld), and from overweight only to overweight and obese from Wave 1.
  ➢ Removal of weight criteria and eligibility opened to all primary school-age children from Wave 5.
  ➢ Revised overall total enrolment target from 1400 to 1100.
• Alternative models developed to launch in Wave 5, reported elsewhere.
Participant Engagement - attendance and retention • Designed and introduced 15 min healthy lifestyle component to child sessions.
• Blitzed marketing campaigns 2 months in advance of sessions commencing.
• Referred to Cochrane review [5] to compare attendance data to that of similar national programs.
• Reviewed pilot attendance data.
• Consultations to gain feedback on content matter, delivery format, frequency of sessions, suite of resources, order of parent sessions and general feedback.
• Consulted enrolled families of eight Wave 2 groups to explore how family resources were being used and could be improved.
• Reviewed program design and content to better align with families concerns and reasons for enrolment.
• Reviewed facilitator training encouraged proactive approach in managing attendance.
• Focussed on using community venues such as schools to reduce stigma.
• Initiated value-add work on ‘why families enrol in PEACH™ QLD’ to assess motivation to enrol in the program.
• Added PEACH™ QLD website functionality for facilitators to record attendance data in real time.
• Reviewed child sessions for appropriateness and enhancement for adherence with current Physical Activity Guidelines [37].
• Reviewed content of 10 parent sessions and modified order.
• Initiated value-add work on ‘why enrolled families do not attend’ to further inform implementation. • Changes to program design:
  ➢ Frequency: sessions 1–9 delivered weekly and within a school term (initially delivered fortnightly with no alignment to school term);
  ➢ Motivational content SMS messages sent to families between session 9 and 10;
  ➢ Three support phone calls more spaced out between sessions 9 and 10 (initially fortnightly); and
  ➢ Introduction of SMS reminders to enrolled families 24 h prior to session (Wave 3 only).
• Parent sessions reordered.
• New edition of Parent Handbook released: language simplified, paper quality lowered, images updated for cultural inclusiveness.
• Value-add resources for families sourced.
• Goal setting tool introduced.
• Child sessions enhanced to address child satisfaction, benefit diversity in child facilitator experience and style, guide delivery of sessions for varying group sizes, levels of complexity, venues and age appropriateness.