Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Feb;127(2):160–170. doi: 10.1037/abn0000331

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Path model depicting direct relationships for deprivation, threat, verbal abilities. SES, and externalizing/internalizing problems. The indirect effect of deprivation to externalizing problems via verbal abilities is significant, beta = 0.15. 95% CI [0.04, 0.30]. The indirect effect of threat to externalizing problems via verbal abilities is nonsignificant, beta = 0.07, 95% CI (−0.05, 0.28]. This model adjusts for the covariance of deprivation and threat, socioeconomic status (SES) and verbal abilities, and externalizing and internalizing problems, and controls for sex.

Inline graphic Non-significant path

Inline graphic Significant path

Inline graphic Significant indirect effect

*p < .01

**p < .01

***p < .001