Table 5. Concordance of the provider-collected cervical HPV DNA specimen to the provider-collected vaginal HPV DNA specimen, and of the self-collected vaginal HPV DNA hybridization assay to the provider-collected vaginal HPV DNA specimen.
A. | Provider-Collected Cervical HPV DNA (n = 53)+ | Sensitivity* | Specificity* | PPV* | NPV* | Kappa | |||
Positive | Negative | Total | 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | ||
Provider-Collected Vaginal HPV DNA | |||||||||
Positive | 6 (11.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (11.3%) | ||||||
Negative | 1 (1.9%) | 46 (86.8%) | 47 (88.7%) | 85.71% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 97.87% | 91.20% | |
Total | 7 (13.2%) | 46 (86.8%) | 53 (100%) | 0.42, 1.00 | 0.92, 1.00 | 0.54, 1.00 | 0.89, 1.00 | 0.74, 1.00 | |
B. | Provider-Collected Vaginal DNA (n = 54)++ | Sensitivity* | Specificity* | PPV* | NPV* | Kappa | |||
Positive | Negative | Total | 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | ||
Self-Collected Vaginal DNA | |||||||||
Positive | 6 (11.1%) | 1 (1.9%) | 7 (13.0%) | 85.71% | 97.87% | 85.71% | 97.87% | 84.59% | |
Negative | 1 (1.9%) | 46 (85.2%) | 47 (87.0%) | 0.42, 1.00 | 0.89, 1.00 | 0.42, 1.00 | 0.94, 1.00 | 0.61, 1.00 | |
Total | 7 (13.0%) | 47 (87.0%) | 54 (100%) |
Author Notes
+Out of 57 tests, there were 4 missing results in the cross tabs (4 missing cervical DNA results of which 2 were also missing for the provider vaginal).
++Out of 57 tests, there were 3 missing results in the cross tabs (2 provider-collected vaginal tests, 1 self-collected vaginal test).
* McNemar’s test used due to the dependency of the data. 95% CI based on exact distribution due to small sample size.