Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 14;13(3):e0193588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193588

Table 3. Comparison of repeat annotation for CARP and RMD.

Summary of specific repeat content from CENSOR output, using a combined library of Repbase ‘Vertebrate’ with CARP or RMD consensus libraries.

IR = Interspersed Repeats

SD = Segmental Duplications.

Chicken Bearded dragon Anolis Platypus Opossum Human
CARP RMD CARP RMD CARP RMD CARP RMD CARP RMD CARP RMD
SINE 0.09 0.09 1.72 2.83 4.02 4.14 19.51 19.51 10.44 10.67 11.25 11.41
LINE 7.73 8.31 11.61 12.55 14.65 15.23 20.40 20.84 28.21 28.83 18.88 18.97
LTR 3.37 3.62 2.38 3.12 5.98 6.26 1.34 1.32 10.62 10.29 9.13 9.49
DNA 2.60 2.08 3.55 6.62 12.84 15.13 1.72 1.67 3.06 2.27 4.49 4.34
Other 1.52 2.22 1.39 1.44 1.51 1.65 2.89 3.10 1.72 1.47 2.04 1.93
IR 15.31 16.32 20.65 26.56 39.00 42.41 45.86 46.44 54.05 53.53 45.79 46.14
Potential SD 1.99 0.17 22.22 7.92 12.02 4.84 12.60 0.58 3.93 0.87 2.94 0.00
Total 17.30 16.49 42.87 34.48 51.02 47.25 58.46 47.02 57.98 54.40 48.73 46.14