Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 13;596(6):993–1017. doi: 10.1113/JP274710

Table 3.

Cumulative wave intensity (i.e. area under the wave)

Baseline l‐NNA Baseline Aortic constriction
Systolic waves
Ao FCWsys 22.46 ± 12.86 9.81 ± 3.10b 24.93 ± 14.14 27.44 ± 9.02
Cx FCWsys 2.83 ± 1.61 0.86 ± 0.40b 3.80 ± 2.08 4.23 ± 3.25
Cx BCWsys −0.81 ± 0.56 −0.53 ± 0.28 −1.42 ± 1.11 −1.47 ± 1.11
Cx | BCWsys/FCWsys | 0.29 ± 0.11 0.61 ± 0.20c 0.39 ± 0.26 0.39 ± 0.20
Diastolic waves
Ao FDWdia 14.38 ± 3.52 18.57 ± 4.33b 16.86 ± 3.38 31.72 ± 11.27b
Ao FCWdia 2.42 ± 1.51 2.69 ± 1.65 3.62 ± 3.41 2.36 ± 4.64
Cx FDWdia 1.00 ± 0.51 0.70 ± 0.31a 0.92 ± 0.48 1.72 ± 1.16
Cx FDWA C (eqn 4) 1.93 ± 0.85 1.60 ± 0.56 a 2.62 ± 1.30 4.68 ± 2.72
Cx FCWdia 1.62 ± 0.68 1.77 ± 1.11 2.32 ± 1.84 1.62 ± 1.38
Cx FCWA C (eqn 5) 0.30 ± 0.17 0.22 ± 0.17 0.64 ± 0.79 0.24 ± 0.37
Cx BDWdia −1.95 ± 0.83 −2.10 ± 0.87 −2.60 ± 1.15 −4.80 ± 2.42a
Cx BDWref (eqn 6) 0.57 ± 0.32 0.95 ± 0.34 a 0.87 ± 0.51 1.63 ± 1.16

Cumulative wave intensity units: 103 W m−2 s−1.

a P < 0.05, b P ≤ 0.01, c P < 0.001 compared with the respective baseline.

Items in italics refer to component waves that were estimated via the indicated equation. There were no significant differences between baseline of Group 1 and baseline of Group 2 for any quantity. Note that BDWmr cumulative intensity cannot be calculated as for peak intensity.