Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 2;11:79–90. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.01.007

Table 1.

Difference in the Expression of miRNAs between R6/2 and Wild-Type Mice

Namea Signal Intensityb
Fold Changes
R6/2 WT
1 mmu-miR-132-3p 406.7 1238.9 0.33
2 mmu-miR-342-3p 132.2 365.6 0.36
3 mmu-miR-212-5p 64.0 167.8 0.38
4 mmu-miR-132-5p 259.5 643.6 0.40
5 mmu-miR-7646-3p 4.6 10.0 0.46
6 mmu-miR-212-3p 175.0 374.3 0.47
7 mmu-miR-26a-1-3p 3.7 6.6 0.56
8 mmu-miR-7213-3p 7.6 13.5 0.56
9 mmu-miR-299a-5p 48.5 84.9 0.57
10 mmu-miR-128-3p 4,682.7 8,038.4 0.58
11 mmu-miR-182-3p 7.6 12.8 0.60
12 mmu-miR-34a-5p 278.0 464.7 0.60
13 mmu-miR-184-3p 12.2 19.7 0.62
14 mmu-miR-6946-3p 5.3 8.7 0.62
15 mmu-miR-465b-5p 5.4 8.5 0.63
16 mmu-miR-153-3p 1,119.1 1,752.8 0.64
17 mmu-miR-144-5p 4.0 6.1 0.65
18 mmu-miR-205-5p 6.5 10.0 0.65
19 mmu-miR-187-3p 318.3 487.9 0.65
20 mmu-miR-708-5p 245.1 369.8 0.66

10-week-old same littermate mice (male) were examined. WT, wild-type.

a

The top 20 miRNAs that markedly decreased in R6/2 mouse are indicated.

b

Hybridization signal intensities obtained from DNA chip analysis are indicated.