Table 1. Features of narrative and systematic reviews.
| Narrative review | Systematic review |
|---|---|
| Flexible structure, format may vary across journals | Pre-defined strict structure |
| Often invited and written by subject experts | Subject experts as authors are desirable but not mandatory |
| Specialized training in searches through bibliographic databases and synthesizing evidence-based information is desirable for authors | Specialized training in meta-analyses is mandatory for authors |
| Search strategy is advisable | Search strategy is mandatory |
| Pre-registration of title is not required | Pre-registration of title is required (Cochrane/PROSPERO) |
| No pre-published protocol | Pre-published protocol is required |
| Broad scope, several citable points | Narrow scope, few citable points |
| Quality assessment of included studies is not required | Quality assessment/risk of bias analysis is mandatory |
| Quantitative synthesis of existing data is not required | Quantitative synthesis of data may be performed (meta-analysis) |
| Not considered as original articles | Some journals consider systematic reviews with meta-analyses as original research articles |
PROSPERO = International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.