Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 31;113(14):1776–1788. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvx175

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Cgnl1 silencing impairs Ve-cadherin adherens junction stabilization. (A) Representative micrographs of fluorescent immunostaining for actin (red) and Ve-cadherin (green) distribution in confluent HUVEC monolayers treated with set 1 siCngl1 versus sisham control. Scale bar represents 10 μm. (B) Quantification analysis of percentage of the Ve-cadherin+ area at cell junctions. Values represent means ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus sisham. Images (right) show inverted version of micrographs used for quantification. Data obtained from four different experiments, with analysis of 12 different micrographs per group per experiment. One-way ANOVA. (C) Representative micrographs of z stack analysis of HUVEC-GFP culture on top of pericyte-RFP, showing the fluorescent signal of Ve-cadherin (shown in red, first column) in confluent HUVEC-GFP + (GFP shown in green, second column) layer treated with siCngl1 versus sisham. DAPI signal in blue. Third column shows composite images of the phalloidin blue + (Alexa Fluor 350) pericyte layer beneath the HUVECs-GFP (green). Last column shows isolated Z-stack layer of phalloidin blue+ pericytes (asterisk indicated). Scale bar represents 20 μm. (D) Quantification analysis of percentage of the Ve-cadherin+ area at cell junctions. Values represent means ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus sisham and control. Images (right) show high details of Ve-cadherin at adherens junctions. Scale bar represents 5 μm. Data obtained from four different experiments, with analysis of six different micrographs per group per experiment. One-way ANOVA.