Table 3.
Difference in postprandial appetite response between regular activity breaks (RABcombine) and sedentary (SITcombine) interventions (n = 35).
| SITcombine AUC Mean (S.D.) (mm·min) | RABcombine AUC Mean (S.D.) (mm·min) | Mean Difference (95% CI) (mm·min) | Standardised Effect (95% CI) | p-Value a | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appetite response to breakfast on Day 1 | 6624 (2427) | 6403 (2297) | −225 (−730, 281) | −0.08 (−0.27, 0.11) | 0.383 |
| Appetite response to breakfast on Day 2 | 6882 (2522) | 7049 (2379) | 129 (−343, 601) | 0.05 (−0.13, 0.23) | 0.593 |
| Combined b appetite response to breakfast | 6783 (2330) | 6726 (2164) | −55 (−437, 326) | −0.02 (−0.16, 0.12) | 0.777 |
| Overall c appetite response over Day 1 | 14,778 (5201) | 14,191 (4750) | −583 (−1499, 333) | 0.11 (−0.28, 0.06) | 0.212 |
| Overall c appetite response over Day 2 | 16,800 (4058) | 16,978 (3887) | 195 (−643, 1033) | 0.04 (−0.15, 0.24) | 0.648 |
a Adjusted for period and order, and also for day when comparing combined appetite response to breakfast; b appetite response to breakfast on day 1 and day 2 combined; c overall appetite response on day 1 was for 6 h with lunch at midday; overall appetite response on day 2 was for 5.5 h, not including lunch.