Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 29;10(2):144. doi: 10.3390/nu10020144

Table 3.

Changes in the population of cecal microbiota in HAS-fed rats transplanted with high H2-producing microbiota.

Correlation (vs. Portal H2)
Order Family Genus C (%) T (%) r p
Actinobacteria 12.0 ± 5.5 18.3 ± 4.4 0.789 4.82 × 105
Bifidobacteriales Bifidobacteriaceae Bifidobacterium 12.0 ± 5.4 18.0 ± 4.3 0.791 4.49 × 10−5
Bacteroidetes 58.0 ± 7.3 39.8 ± 4.1 * −0.408 0.0757
Bacteroidales Bacteroidaceae Bacteroides 40.2 ± 9.0 8.0 ± 3.1 ** −0.507 0.0240
Bacteroidales s24-7 15.7 ± 2.7 30.7 ± 4.7 * −0.084 0.724
Bacteroidales Porphyromonadaceae Parabacteroides 1.7 ± 0.5 1.0 ± 0.4 0.316 0.0190
Firmicutes 23.8 ± 3.2 34.3 ± 4.6 −0.0992 0.677
Lactobacillales Lactobacillaceae Lactobacillus 9.3 ± 3.1 9.1 ± 1.9 0.368 0.111
Clostridiales Lachnospiraceae Blautia 1.1 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.9 −0.107 0.653
Clostridiales Lachnospiraceae Clostridium 1.2 ± 0.3 2.1 ± 0.5 0.383 0.0957
Clostridiales Lachnospiraceae Other 5.8 ± 0.9 1.9 ± 0.8 −0.397 0.0841
Clostridiales Ruminococcaceae Ruminococcus 1.1 ± 0.5 6.8 ± 4.9 −0.567 0.0103
Clostridiales Ruminococcaceae Oscillospira 1.1 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.3 * −0.0391 0.871
Clostridiales Ruminococcaceae Other 1.2 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.1 −0.112 0.678
Erysipelotrichales Erysipelotrichaceae Allobaculum 1.2 ± 0.4 6.1 ± 2.5 0.666 1.77 × 10−3
Erysipelotrichales Erysipelotrichaceae Eubacterium 0.1 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.0 −0.405 0.0780
Proteobacteria 4.1 ± 1.2 4.4 ± 0.7 −0.370 0.109
Enterobacteriale Enterobacteriaceae Escherichia 0.3 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.7 ** −0.453 0.0466
Enterobacteriales Enterobacteriaceae Other 3.0 ± 1.3 0.0 ± 0.0
Burkholderiales Alcaligenaceae Sutterella 0.8 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.2 0.341 0.141
Verrucomicrobia 1.9 ± 1.9 3.1 ± 2.7 −0.383 0.0960
Verrucomicrobiales Verrucomicrobiaceae Akkermansia 1.9 ± 1.9 3.1 ± 2.7 −0.383 0.0960

Data are expressed as the means ± SE, n = 10 and transplantation groups, n = 11. Data that were less than 0.1% in both the control and transplantation groups were omitted from the table. Data were analyzed using the Student’s t-test or Welch’s test. Transplantation of the inoculum was performed on days 3 and 4. C, control group; T, transplantation group. *, ** Mean values were significantly different from those of the control group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). Mean values tended to be higher than those of the control group (p = 0.0777). Correlations were determined by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.