Table 3.
Correlation ‡ (vs. Portal H2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Order | Family | Genus | C (%) | T (%) | r | p |
Actinobacteria | 12.0 ± 5.5 | 18.3 ± 4.4 | 0.789 | 4.82 × 10−5 | ||
Bifidobacteriales | Bifidobacteriaceae | Bifidobacterium | 12.0 ± 5.4 | 18.0 ± 4.3 | 0.791 | 4.49 × 10−5 |
Bacteroidetes | 58.0 ± 7.3 | 39.8 ± 4.1 * | −0.408 | 0.0757 | ||
Bacteroidales | Bacteroidaceae | Bacteroides | 40.2 ± 9.0 | 8.0 ± 3.1 ** | −0.507 | 0.0240 |
Bacteroidales | s24-7 | 15.7 ± 2.7 | 30.7 ± 4.7 * | −0.084 | 0.724 | |
Bacteroidales | Porphyromonadaceae | Parabacteroides | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 0.316 | 0.0190 |
Firmicutes | 23.8 ± 3.2 | 34.3 ± 4.6 † | −0.0992 | 0.677 | ||
Lactobacillales | Lactobacillaceae | Lactobacillus | 9.3 ± 3.1 | 9.1 ± 1.9 | 0.368 | 0.111 |
Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Blautia | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 3.1 ± 0.9 | −0.107 | 0.653 |
Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Clostridium | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 0.383 | 0.0957 |
Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Other | 5.8 ± 0.9 | 1.9 ± 0.8 | −0.397 | 0.0841 |
Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Ruminococcus | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 6.8 ± 4.9 | −0.567 | 0.0103 |
Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Oscillospira | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.3 * | −0.0391 | 0.871 |
Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Other | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | −0.112 | 0.678 |
Erysipelotrichales | Erysipelotrichaceae | Allobaculum | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 6.1 ± 2.5 | 0.666 | 1.77 × 10−3 |
Erysipelotrichales | Erysipelotrichaceae | Eubacterium | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | −0.405 | 0.0780 |
Proteobacteria | 4.1 ± 1.2 | 4.4 ± 0.7 | −0.370 | 0.109 | ||
Enterobacteriale | Enterobacteriaceae | Escherichia | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 3.1 ± 0.7 ** | −0.453 | 0.0466 |
Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Other | 3.0 ± 1.3 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | − | − |
Burkholderiales | Alcaligenaceae | Sutterella | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 0.341 | 0.141 |
Verrucomicrobia | 1.9 ± 1.9 | 3.1 ± 2.7 | −0.383 | 0.0960 | ||
Verrucomicrobiales | Verrucomicrobiaceae | Akkermansia | 1.9 ± 1.9 | 3.1 ± 2.7 | −0.383 | 0.0960 |
Data are expressed as the means ± SE, n = 10 and transplantation groups, n = 11. Data that were less than 0.1% in both the control and transplantation groups were omitted from the table. Data were analyzed using the Student’s t-test or Welch’s test. Transplantation of the inoculum was performed on days 3 and 4. C, control group; T, transplantation group. *, ** Mean values were significantly different from those of the control group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). † Mean values tended to be higher than those of the control group (p = 0.0777). ‡ Correlations were determined by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.