Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 30;10(2):156. doi: 10.3390/nu10020156

Table 3.

Nine-month changes in all outcome measures within-group (n = 63).

Intervention Group Control Group
Comparison Mean (95% CI) p-Value Mean (95% CI) p-Value
BMI-for-age z-score T1-T0 −0.07 (−0.15, 0.01) 0.092 0.07 (0.01, 0.14) 0.032
T2-T0 −0.06 (−0.25, 0.13) 0.544 0.18 (0.10, 0.26) <0.001 ***
T2-T1 0.01 (−0.17, 0.19) 0.905 0.10 (0.05, 0.16) 0.001 **
Body fat percentage (%) T1-T0 −3.4 (1.8, 5.0) <0.001 ** 0.4 (−0.1, 0.9) 0.081
T2-T0 −1.6 (−3.8, 0.6) 0.154 2.2 (1.3, 3.0) <0.001 ***
T2-T1 1.8 (−0.5, 4.2) 0.127 1.7 (0.7, 2.7) 0.001 **
Waist circumference (cm) T1-T0 −2.1 (−3.7, −0.5) 0.014 * 0.7 (−0.3, 1.7) 0.165
T2-T0 −1.9 (−4.1, 0.3) 0.091 2.5 (0.9, 4.1) 0.002 **
T2-T1 0.2(−1.5, 1.8) 0.812 1.8 (0.7, 3.0) 0.002 **
Pedometer step-count ¥ T1-T0 −8 (−60, 45) 0.768 30 (−18, 78) 0.212
T2-T0 35 (−31, 100) 0.290 51 (−83, 184) 0.440
T2-T1 42 (−7, 91) 0.087 −21 (−109, 150) 0.742

T0—Baseline; T1—post intervention (thirteenth week); T2—follow up (ninth month); Repeated measures ANCOVA within group analysis was applied followed by pairwise comparison with confidence interval adjustment; Household income and baseline variables were controlled by using repeated measures ANCOVA; ¥ involved 55 children (28 from intervention group and 27 from control group); * significant at the 0.05 level; ** significant at the 0.01 level; *** significant at the 0.001 level.