Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 26;7(1):27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2017.12.004

Table 2.

Comparison of the population parameters between the two sampling localities. IH: Infested hosts; N: Total of bats; A = Abundance; P%: Prevalence; CI: Confidence interval for the prevalence; MI: Mean intensity.

Manso
Luis Ruiz
IH/N A P% CI MI IH/N A P% CI MI
Trematoda
 Ochoterenatrema sp. 9/16 103 56% 0.81 11.4 8/26 154 32% 0.34 19.3
 Paralecithodendrium sp. 3/16 12 19% 0.38 4.0
 Parabascus limatulus 10/16 159 63% 0.86 15.9 6/26 10 24% 0.40 1.7
 Parabascus sp. 10/16 101 63% 0.86 10.1 8/26 69 32% 0.50 8.6
 Postorchigenes cf. joannae 2/16 8 13% 0.29 4.0
Cestoda
 Vampirolepis sp. 1a 1/16 1 6% 1
 Vampirolepis sp. 2a 1/16 1 6% 1
Nematoda
 Allintoshius baudi 12/16 48 75% 0.96 4.0
 Physaloptera sp. 1/26 1 4% 0.12 1
 Physocephalus sp. 7/16 16 44% 0.68 2.3 5/26 14 19% 0.34 2.8
a

Immature proglottids were found in the host with the scolex.