Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2018 Jan 17;553(7689):496–500. doi: 10.1038/nature25442

Figure 4. Different modalities of CD40-CD40L interaction between CD4+ T cells and DCs in vivo.

Figure 4

a, Experimental setup for b–c. b–c, Flow cytometric analysis of pLN cells showing biotin labeling of endogenous and transferred DCs 12 (b) or 48 (c) hours post-T cell transfer. d, Flow cytometry of pLN cells showing biotin labeling of transferred DCs 48 hours post-T cell transfer. Experimental set up as in a, except that bystander DCs are H2−/−. e, CD40L expression in activated CD4+ T cells. Histogram plots show CD40L surface staining in Cd40lg+/Y OT-II (left panel) or Cd40lgSrtA/Y CD4-Cre OT-II (right panel) CD69+ CD4+ T cells. Data representative of two independent experiments. f, Graph shows percentage of CD69+ CD4+ T cells positive for CD40L. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test and unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-test were used for statistical analysis. g, Principal component analysis of transcriptomic profiles of endogenous biotin+ and biotin MHC-IIhi CD11c+ CD11b+ XCR1 DCs sorted 48 hours post-T cell transfer from mice treated as in a. Each symbol represents one sample derived from one mouse in a single experiment. h, Experimental setup for i. i, Flow cytometry of pLN cells showing biotin labeling of endogenous and transferred Cd40G5/G5 DCs 12 hours post-T cell transfer. Graph represents percentage of biotin+ DCs gated as shown among different DC populations. b–d, f, i, Each symbol represents one mouse; bar indicates mean; data pooled from two independent experiments.