Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 7;55(3):485–494. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev343

Table 3.

Characteristics and frequency of US abnormality in SLE patients

Author Clinical arthritis/ arthralgia (%) US synovitis (OMERACT) (%) GS (%) PDo (%) Tenosynovitis (%) Erosion (%) Reliability, κ
Wright et al. [12] 100 94a Wrist 94 MCP 71a Wrist 82 MCP 35a FT 65 MCP 41b Inter for synovitis 0.85  Inter for Erosion 0.78
Iagnocco et al. [18] 10 58a Wrists 42c Wrists 9.90d FT 44.2a Wrist 3.8 inter 0.73–0.89 intra 0.82–1
Delle Sedie et al. [19] 60 Wrist 80  Hand 50a NS NS 28a 2 No
Ossandon et al. [20] 40 Knees 58a 42a 15a NA 0 No
Torrente-Segarra et al. [21] 48 25 Wrists 25  MCP 11  PIP 7 Wrist 13 ET 39  FT 7 NA Inter ≥ 0.85  Intra ≥ 0.78
Gabba et al. [22] 36 25d NS 13b 36b 21b Inter 0.68–0.96
Iagnocco et al. [25] 40 NS Wrist 22  MCP 24  PIP 9.7  MTP 50 Wrist 11  MCP 10  PIP 3  MTP 5 NA NA No
Ball et al. [23] 100 NS NS NS 38b No
Buosi et al. [24] 100 Wrist 47  MCP 84  PIP 58 Wrist 47  MCP 84  PIP 58 Wrist 31  MCP 28  PIP 16 NA Wrist 18  MCP 13  PIP 4 Inter 0.40–0.78 GS  Inter 0.60–1 PDo, 0.53–0.77 erosion

aPercentage of patients. bRecalculated from study tables after excluding Rhupus (not presented in original paper). cPercentage of joints. dData including Rhupus. NS: not specified; GS: grey scale; PDo: power Doppler; Rhupus: RA/SLE overlap; FT: flexor hand tendons; ET: extensor wrist tendons.