Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 7;34(1):4–19. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw214

Table 4.

Summary Statistics of the HPV16 E6 Gene Sequences (n = 1,123) with Geographic Origin of the Sample.

Metapopulation n bp S h Hd (95% CI)a (95% CI)b MPD (95% CI)a (95% CI)b WIMP Tajima’s D P-valuec (95% CI)b P-valueb Fu’s-Li’s D* (95% CI)b P-valueb R2 (95% CI)b P-valueb
sub-Saharan Africa 213 456 34 32 0.754 (0.712 –0.796) (0.439 –0.892) 3.049 (2.739 –3.359) (0.815 –7.389) 1.459 –1.427 >0.1 (–1.642 to 2.053) 0.047 –3.459 (–2.178 to 1.523) 0.003 0.044 (0.033 –0.148) 0.100
North Africa 221 456 30 26 0.861 (0.839 –0.883) (0.653 –0.918) 4.985 (4.52 –5.45) (1.543 –12.592) 0.969 –0.196 >0.1 (–1.598 to 2.097) 0.519 –3.288 (–1.959 to 1.311) 0.466 0.081 (0.035 –0.14) 0.533
Europe 161 456 31 25 0.734 (0.688 –0.78) (0.16 –0.838) 1.62 (1.401 –1.839) (0.194 –4.219) 1.187 –2.043 <0.05 (–1.62 to 2.05) 0.001 –3.825 (–1.958 to 1.447) 0.002 0.026 (0.028 –0.164) 0.017
South Asia 139 456 8 6 0.523 (0.455 –0.591) (0.056 –0.797) 0.998 (0.831 –1.165) (0.043 –2.744) 0.464 –0.724 >0.1 (–1.509 to 2.026) 0.253 –0.454 (–2.302 to 1.297) 0.281 0.062 (0.026 –0.193) 0.302
East Asia 207 456 31 37 0.643 (0.567 –0.719) (0.495 –0.894) 3.425 (3.079 –3.771) (0.853 –8.014) 1.712 1.211 >0.1 (–1.593 to 2.11) 0.091 –2.848 (–2.415 to 1.606) 0.014 0.054 (0.032 –0.146) 0.180
Central America 50 456 21 14 0.889 (0.851 –0.927) (0.589 –0.925) 4.551 (3.641 –5.461) (1.197 –10.979) 1.803 –0.237 >0.1 (–1.683 to 2.033) 0.475 –1.027 (–2.568 to 1.511) 0.167 0.103 (0.052 –0.177) 0.503
South America 132 402 18 17 0.78 (0.744 –0.816) (0.486 –0.893) 3.184 (2.774 –3.594) (0.772 –7.859) 0.947 –0.096 >0.1 (–1.613 to 1.896) 0.526 –0.850 (–2.371 to 1.543) 0.185 0.087 (0.035 –0.156) 0.542

Note.—Number of samples (n), base pair (bp), Segregating sites (S), haplotypes (h), haplotype diversity (Hd), mean pairwise difference (MPD), weighted intralineage mean pairwise difference (WIMP) (Hurles et al. 2002), Tajima’s D, Fu’s and Li’s D* and R2 statistics were calculated using DnaSP (Librado and Rozas 2009).

a

Calculcated from empirical distribution.

b

Calculated from a coalescent simulation with 1,000 replications and no recombination.

c

Calculated assuming beta distribution.