. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 Aug 4;86:78–86. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.08.003

Table 1.

Unadjusted means at each time point and results from planned contrasts comparing the intervention and control groups on emotional responses to the personal recall task.

	Unadjusted means (SD)						Group differences
	Baseline		Post-task		Rest		Reactivity^a	Recovery^b

	Intervention	Control	Intervention	Control	Intervention	Control	p	p
Angry	.16 (.45)	.07 (.26)	.93 (1.15)	.64 (.87)	.19 (.47)	.36 (.78)	.372	.044
Sad	.31 (.69)	.39 (.83)	1.79 (1.37)	1.46 (1.32)	.38 (.66)	.71 (1.12)	.122	.011
Anxious	.44 (.62)	.82 (.86)	1.5 (1.23)	1.68 (1.16)	.66 (.90)	.93 (1.05)	.507	.83

Reactivity was calculated as the change from baseline to post-task.

Recovery was calculated as the change from post-task to the rest period.

Note. Unadjusted means are presented here. P values for reactivity and recovery are based on adjusted models. Emotion ratings were given 6 minutes in to the 12-minute rest period.