Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0193385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193385

Table 4. Clinicopathological characteristics of matched patients with synchronous liver metastases undergoing simultaneous or colorectal-first treatment.

Simultaneous (n = 70) Colorectal first (n = 70) P-value
Patient characteristics
Mean age ± SD 62.2 ± 11.6 62.3 ± 9.0 0.947
Male gender 37 (52.9%) 34 (48.6%) 0.720
Extent of liver surgery 0.475
≥3 segments 25 (35.7%) 27 (38.6%)
1 or 2 segments 13 (18.6%) 14 (20.0%)
RFA or wedge resection 32 (45.7%) 29 (41.4%)
RFA 0.424a
RFA as part of treatment 30 (42.9%) 25 (35.7%)
 • RFA + resection 19 (29.9%) 11 (15.7%)
 • Only RFA 11 (15.7%) 20.0%)
Of which percutaneous 0 10 (14.3%)
Characteristics tumor
Low clinical risk score (0–2)[21] 37 (52.9%) 36 (51.4%) 1.000
Diam. CRLM in cm (median ± IQR) 2.5 ± 2.5 3.0 ± 3.5 0.106
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 35 (50.0%) 32 (45.7%) 0.690
Primary tumor at rectal site 36 (51.4%) 34 (48.6%) 0.832
Bilobar liver disease 23 (32.9%) 32 (45.7%) 0.160

Matching was performed based on the characteristics: location of primary tumor, major/minor liver surgery, type of liver procedure, clinical risk score, sex, age and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

P values were calculated using the paired T test, McNemar test or Wilcoxon signed rank test.

a RFA vs. no RFA in simultaneous vs. colorectal-first treatment.