Table 2. Predator and prey total length (TL, mm) transformations (trans.) and quantile regression derived equations.

Species	Prey shape	Predator trans.	Prey trans.	Equation
Crappie	All	$\sqrt{x}$	loge(y)	$PreyTL=exp(\alpha +\beta \bullet \sqrt{predatorTL})$
Largemouth Bass	All	x	loge(y)	Prey TL = exp(α + β ∙ predator TL)
	Fusiform	loge(x)	loge(y)	Prey TL = exp(α + β ∙ loge (predator TL))
	Lat. comp.	x2	loge(y)	Prey TL = exp(α + β ∙predator TL2)
Muskellunge	All	x	loge(y)	Prey TL = exp(α + β ∙predator TL)
	Fusiform	x	loge(y)	Prey TL = exp(α + β ∙predator TL)
	Lat. comp.	x	$\sqrt{y}$	Prey TL = exp(α + β ∙predator TL)2
Northern Pike	All	loge(x)	loge(y)	Prey TL = exp(α + β ∙ loge (predator TL))
Rock Bass	All	x2	loge(y)	Prey TL = exp(α + β ∙predator TL2)
Smallmouth Bass	All	x2	loge(y)	Prey TL = exp(α + β ∙predator TL2)
Walleye	All	x	loge(y)	Prey TL = exp(α + β ∙predator TL)
	Fusiform	x	loge(y)	Prey TL = exp(α + β ∙predator TL)
	Lat. comp.	x2	loge(y)	Prey TL = exp(α + β ∙predator TL2)

Piscivores evaluated include a grouped ‘crappie’ category (P. nigromaculatus and P. annularis), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), muskellunge (Esox masquinongy), northern pike (Esox lucius), rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu), and walleye (Sander vitreus). The analysis was performed on all prey shapes and, when sample sizes were sufficient, performed on fusiform and laterally compressed (lat. comp.) shaped prey as well.