Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194005

Table 1. Distribution of participation by coordinating centre at three levels (centres, professionals and participants) one year after implementation.

Analysis level Primary Care Centres Primary Care Professionals Participants
Coordinating Centre Proposed Inactive* Active Proposed Inactive** Active Screened Excluded Included
1. Mútua Terrassa 9 0 (0) 9 (100) 67 22 (32.8) 45 (67.2) 349 54 (15.5) 295 (84.5)
2. El Carmel 12 0 (0) 12 (100) 42 9 (21.4) 33 (78.6) 357 90 (25.2) 267 (74.8)
3. Terres de l’Ebre 16 2 (12.5) 14 (87.5) 83 37 (44.6) 46 (55.4) 276 44 (15.9) 232 (84.1)
4. Reus-Tarragona 18 3 (16.6) 15 (83.4) 64 33 (51.6) 31 (49.4) 240 40 (16.7) 200 (83.3)
5. Sant Martí 9 2 (22.2) 7 (77.8) 53 24 (45.3) 29 (54.7) 181 29 (16.1) 152 (83.9)
6. Tordera-Blanes 8 1 (12.5) 7 (87.5) 58 25 (45.1) 33 (54.9) 179 64 (35.7) 115 (64.3)
7. Hospitalet-Cornellà 11 4 (36.4) 7 (63.6) 83 39 (46.9) 44 (53.1) 144 33 (22.9) 111 (77.1)
8. Cervera-Tàrrega 11 0 (0) 11 (100) 53 12 (22.6) 41 (77.4) 84 5 (5.9) 79 (94.1)
9. Pirineus-Nord 9 8 (88.8) 1 (11.2) 3 0 (0) 3 (100) 9 2 (22.2) 7 (77.8)
Total 103 20 (19.4) 83 (80.6) 506 201 (39.7) 305 (60.3) 1819 361 (19.8) 1458 (80.2)

Data are n or n (%). The coordinating centres are ordered by current number of participants in lifestyle intervention.

(*) Centres without active professionals one year after implementation.

(**) Professionals who did not maintain regular web-based activities.