Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Nov 7;170(11):e162385. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2385

Table 4.

Within-family Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for Offspring Obesity Associated With Cesarean vs. Vaginal Delivery. Data from the Growing Up Today Study, 1996–2011

Variable Within-family analysis

Obese/participants (%) OR (95%CI)
Overall
 Vaginal Delivery 1,091/10,155 (11%) 1.00 (ref)
 Cesarean Delivery (Model 1)* 417/2,748 (15%) 1.64 (1.08, 2.48) 0.02
9–18 years old
 Vaginal Delivery 719/10,113 (7%) 1.00 (ref)
 Cesarean Delivery (Model 1)* 301/2,739 (11%) 1.67 (1.01, 2.76) 0.044
19–28 years old
 Vaginal Delivery 677/6,714 (10%) 1.00 (ref)
 Cesarean Delivery (Model 1)* 233/1,772 (13%) 1.72 (0.89, 3.32) 0.107
*

Conditional logistic regression model adjusted for maternal age at delivery, race (white, other), maternal pre-pregnancy BMI group (<18.5, 18.5–24.99, 25–29.99, 30+ kg/m2), gestational diabetes (yes, no), preeclampsia (yes, no), pregnancy induced hypertension(yes, no), child sex (male, female), year of birth (<=1984, 1985–1989, >1989), gestational age at delivery (<37, 37–39, 40–42, 43+ weeks), previous Cesarean section(yes, no), birth order, birth weight group (<5, 5–6.9, 7–8.4,8.5–9.9, 10+ lbs), pre-pregnancy smoking (never, past, current) and region of residence at birth (Northeast, Midwest, West, South).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure