Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 15;9:1099. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03541-0

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Hidden cursor population results for position error encoding. a Average encoding strength (R2) of both lead and lag encoding for the 11 Purkinje cells with significant decreases in SS encoding of position error in the hidden cursor condition. Analysis of variance yielded a significant interaction between the feedback condition and the timing of encoding (F(1,35) = 10.65, p = 0.0026, ANOVA) with a significant decrease in the amplitude of the lagging but not the leading R2. b Average timing of lead and lag SS encoding of performance in baseline and hidden cursor conditions is not significantly different (F(1,45) = 1.04, p = 0.31, ANOVA)