Fig. 8.

Kinematic encoding is unaffected by visual feedback manipulations. a Firing maps for an example Purkinje cell with lead SS velocity modulation in both baseline (top row) and 100 ms delay (bottom row) conditions. Each map indicates SS modulation at a specific lead (negative τ) or lag (positive τ). b and cR² and sensitivity profiles, respectively, for the example Purkinje cell shown in a with significant encoding of manipulandum velocity in both baseline (black line) and 100 ms delay (green line) conditions. d Average peak timing of both lead and lag SS encoding of manipulandum kinematics did not change between baseline and delay conditions (F(1,107) = 0.15, p = 0.70, ANOVA). e Average encoding strength (R²) of lead and lag encoding for all Purkinje cells with significant encoding of kinematics (F(1,107) = 0.47, p = 0.71, ANOVA). f Firing maps for an example Purkinje cell with lead SS velocity modulation in both baseline (top row) and hidden (bottom row) conditions. Each map indicates SS modulation at a specific lead (negative τ) or lag (positive τ). g and hR² and sensitivity profiles, respectively, for the example Purkinje cell shown in f with significant encoding of manipulandum velocity in both baseline (black line) and hidden cursor (red line) conditions. i Average peak timing of both lead and lag SS encoding of manipulandum kinematics in baseline and hidden cursor conditions (F(1,113) = 0.01, p = 0.93, ANOVA). j Average encoding strength (R²) of lead and lag encoding for all Purkinje cells with significant encoding of kinematics (F(1,113) = 1.48, p = 0.23, ANOVA)