Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 15;8:4637. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22984-5

Table 1.

Demographics and clinical variables.

HC (N = 17) AD (N = 26) DLB (N = 25) PDD (N = 21) p-value
Age 76.18 ±5.65 76.46 ±7.83 75.8 ±6.5 73.29 ±5.842 F(3,85) = 1.03, p-value = 0.380Т
Male/Female 10/7 18/8 20/5 19/2 Χ2(3, N = 89) = 5.89, p-value = 0.117ǂ
MMSE 29.12 ±0.857 20.08 ±4.279 22.64 ±4.3 22.71 ±4.85 F(2,69) = 2.81; p-value = 0.067*
CAMCOG total 96.47 ±3.69 66.54 ±16.46 76.08 ±12.92 73.38 ±13.88 F(2,69) = 2.89; p-value = 0.063*
CAMCOG executive 22.71 ±2.25 14.46 ±5.49 13.12 ±5.03 12.9 ±2.86 F(2,69) = 0.79; p-value = 0.457*
CAMCOG memory 23.47 ±2.035 10.88 ±5.1 18.04 ±4.9 17.48 ±5.05 F(2,69) = 15.5; p-value < 0.001*
CAMCOG attention 6.76 ±0.562 3.81 ±2.514 4.4 ±2.27 4.19 ±1.721 F(2,69) = 0.465; p-value = 0.63*
NPI hall 0 0 0.04 ±0.2 1.76 ±1.86 2.57 ±2.29 F(2,68) = 14.1; p-value < 0.001*
CAF total 0 0 0.6 ±1.52 3.92 ±4.142 6.63 ±4.271 t(42) = 2.12, p-value = 0.03
Animal Categorical fluency 20.71 ±5.71 11.15 ±5.25 11.16 ±3.88 11.33 ±4.14 F(2,69) = 0.011; p-value = 0.989*
UPDRS III 1.24 ±1.522 2.28 ±1.929 15.52 ±8.2 25.57 ±7.018 t(44) = 4.42, p-value < 0.001
Angle discrimination 19.63 ±0.88 18.24 ±3.72 16.17 ±4.85 16.55 ±4.99 H(2) = 4.1, p-value = 0.129ǂ
FAS Verbal fluency 45.12 ±16.53 25.96 ±16.14 19.68 ±12 20.81 ±13.7 H(2) = 1.94, p-value = 0.378ǂ
LEDD 0 0 0 0 164.88 ±231.6 818.23 ±381.3 t(44) = 7.15, p-value < 0.001
ACheI (yes/no) 0/17 24/2 23/2 16/4 Χ2(2, N = 71) = 2.13, p-value = 0.346
Years since diagnosis 0 0 1.77 ±1.13 0.87 ±0.63 1.41 ±1.91 H(2) = 10.9, p-value = 0.004ǂ

*ANOVA three groups (AD, DLB, PDD);

ТANOVA four groups;

ǂχ2 test four groups.

ǂUnpaired t-test (DLB vs PDD);

Kruskal-Wallis three groups (AD, DLB, PDD).

One PDD patient was on Memantine.