Table 1.
Potential criterion | Explanation |
Importance to patients, service users or the population | What would be the impact of any new or altered guidance on the population (eg, acceptability to patients or service users, quality of life, morbidity or disease prevalence, severity of disease or mortality)? |
Relevance to NICE guidance | How would the answer to this question change future NICE guidance (ie, generate new knowledge or evidence)? How important is the question to the overall guidance?
|
Relevance to the NHS, public health, social care and voluntary sectors | What would be the impact on the NHS, public health, social care and voluntary sector and (if relevant) the public sector of any new or altered guidance (eg, financial advantage, or effect on staff, strategic planning or service delivery)? |
National priorities | Is the question relevant to a national priority area (such as a national policy or parliamentary paper)? If so, specify the document. |
Current evidence base | What are the problems with the current evidence base? (That is, why is further research needed?) Is there any relevant ongoing research that may resolve the uncertainty? |
Equality | Does the research recommendation have any relevance to equality? For example, does it focus on groups needing special consideration, or on a technology, intervention or service that is not available for use by people with certain disabilities? What is known about the impact of the intervention on the health gradient? |
Feasibility | Can the proposed research be carried out within a realistic timescale? Would the sample size needed to resolve the question be feasible? Would the expense needed to resolve the question be warranted? Are there any ethical or technical issues? |
Other comments | Any other important issues that should be mentioned, such as potential funders, outcomes of previous attempts to address this issue or methodological problems. |
NHS, National Health Service; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.