. 2018 Jan 25;19(2):357. doi: 10.3390/ijms19020357

Table 3.

QTLs of resistance to PSS4 and R3598 strains, detected by multiple QTL mapping (stepwise model) for the EG203 × MM738 DH population, on individual seasons and across the seasons (Comb).

Strains	Season	Var ^a	Chr ^b	QTL ^c	Pos ^d	Nearest Marker	Interval ^e	LOD	R^{2 f}	Add Effect ^g	Total R^{2 h}
PSS4	1	SCO_max	E03	ERPR3a	16.0	s296164	3.0–29.0	3.8	13.2	−0.38 ***	13.2
		W_a	E03	ERPR3a	16.0	s296164	2.0–27.2	3.4	11.9	−9.11 ***	11.9
		CI	E01	ERPR1	76.8	s219212	47.0–88.3	3.5	4.8	−4.96 ***	65.4
			E02	ERPR2a	40.0	s135116	34.0–77.0	4.1	5.7	−5.55 ***
			E03	ERPR3a	4.1	s227496	0.0–13.0	7.3	10.8	−7.69 ***
			E03	ERPR3b	126.7	s231411	125.8–140.0	10.7	17.0	−9.49 ***
			E04	ERPR4	101.3	s46892	99.0–102.0	8.5	13.0	−7.23 ***
			E06	ERPR6a	23.0	s902	22.0–33.0	10.2	16.0	−7.32 ***
			E07	ERPR7	41.6	s272460	35.0–45.0	6.4	9.4	−6.87 ***
			Epistasis	ERPR4:ERPR6a				2.9	4.0	−4.65 ***
	2	SCO_max	E02	ERPR2b	98.4	s51429	94.0–104.0	5.5	12.3	−0.33 ***	45.7
			E04	ERPR4	79.0	s400	68.0–92.0	5.0	11.2	−0.32 ***
			E06	ERPR6b	40.0	s431	38.0–43.0	9.9	25.3	−0.48 ***
			E08	ERPR8	23.4	s105566	18.0–28.6	5.0	11.5	−0.31 ***
		W_a	E02	ERPR2b	98.4	s51429	94.0–103.0	5.7	13.8	−3.86 ***	40.4
			E04	ERPR4	88.4	s208766	74.0–105.0	4.2	8.0	−2.93 ***
			E06	ERPR6b	41.0	s147256	38.6–49.0	7.5	16.8	−4.41 ***
			E08	ERPR8	23.4	s105566	18.0–54.0	4.7	11.0	−3.50 ***
		CI	E01	ERPR1	38.8	s231295	19.0–109.0	3.1	10.9	−5.83 ***	10.9
	Comb	SCO_max	E02	ERPR2b	98.4	s51429	82.0–102.2	6.2	12.1	−0.30 ***	54.0
			E03	ERPR3a	21.0	s168838	2.0–31.0	3.5	6.4	−0.23 ***
			E04	ERPR4	71.3	s53085	66.0–97.0	5.5	10.5	−0.29 ***
			E06	ERPR6b	40.0	s431	39.0–42.2	10.3	21.7	−0.43 ***
			E08	ERPR8	23.4	s105566	18.0–28.6	5.5	10.4	−0.28 ***
		W_a	E02	ERPR2b	98.4	s51429	79.0–102.2	5.0	11.4	−3.29 ***	44.9
			E04	ERPR4	97.0	s311121	68.0–107.0	4.8	10.9	−3.26 ***
			E06	ERPR6b	40.3	s147256	39.0–43.0	7.7	18.5	−4.28 ***
			E08	ERPR8	23.4	s105566	17.0–50.0	4.6	10.4	−3.17 ***
		CI	E01	ERPR1	68.0	s168619	43.3–84.2	4.5	7.9	−4.98 ***	56.9
			E02	ERPR2b	87.7	s131841	74.0–99.2	5.0	8.9	−5.13 ***
			E03	ERPR3a	4.1	s227496	2.0–27.0	4.5	7.8	−4.98 ***
			E03	ERPR3b	127.5	s231125	124.0–130.0	7.1	13.1	−6.37 ***
			E04	ERPR4	71.0	s53085	66.6–79.6	6.6	12.0	−6.22 ***
			E06	ERPR6a	39.4	s56388	26.0–45.0	6.5	11.9	−6.19 ***
R3598	1	SCO_b	E03	ERPR3a	4.7	s231544	0.0–28.0	3.2	11.4	−1.09 ***	11.4
		CI_10b	E03	ERPR3a	5.0	s197676	2.0–7.2	9.4	29.7	−1.34 ***	29.7
		CI_b	E03	ERPR3a	5.0	s197676	3.0–7.2	7.3	21.4	−1.39 ***	31.3
		CI_b	E06	ERPR6c	46.0	s681	39.0–65.0	4.3	12.0	−1.06 ***	31.3
	2	SCO_b	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
		CI_10b	E09	ERPR9	51.5	s75856	42.9–59.1	4.4	15.0	−0.95 ***	15.0
		CI_b	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
	Comb	SCO.b	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
		CI10.b	E03	ERPR3a	4.1	s227496	0.0–7.0	8.0	25.8	−1.20 ***	25.8
		CI.b	E03	ERPR3a	5.0	s197676	0.0–14.0	4.0	12.6	−1.04 ***	21.6
		CI.b	E06	ERPR6c	46.0	s681	9.9–70.2	3.3	10.3	−0.91 ***	21.6

^a The variables used are the maximal score (SCO_max), the BLUP of area under disease progress curve for wilting percentage (Wa) and the colonization index (CI). ^b Linkage groups named according to their chromosome correspondence. ^c Name of the QTL: Eggplant Ralstonia Pseudosolanacearum Resistance (ERPR) followed by the chromosome number. When several QTLs were detected on the same chromosome, a letter follows the QTL name for identification purposes. ^d Position of the maximum logarithm of odds score (LOD) in centimorgans (cM). ^e 95% Bayesian confidence interval (cM). ^f Estimates of the percentage of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL detected. ^g Additive effect: a positive value indicates that the resistance comes from the E8 (MM738) allele, a negative value indicates that the resistance comes from the E4 (EG203) allele. ^h Estimates of the total percentage of phenotypic variance explained by the additive model; ns: QTLs not detected above the LOD threshold. R²;***: significant at p < 0.001.