Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 19;7(1):17–26. doi: 10.1007/s13566-017-0328-1

Table 3.

Analysis of potential predictors for developing skin complaints within 4 weeks after treatment for painful spinal metastases

Baseline variables % of patients with Odds ratio (95% CI)
Skin complaints UVAa MVAa
Primary tumor
 Breast cancer 31% 1.00 1.00
 Prostate cancer 28% 0.87 (0.47–1.61) 0.95 (0.50–1.79)
 Lung cancer 49% 2.19 (1.17–4.11) 2.27 (1.20–4.30)
 Other 36% 1.26 (0.61–2.62) 1.28 (0.61–2.70)
Age
 ≤ 65 years 39% 1.00 #
 > 65 years 30% 0.66 (0.41–1.06)
Gender
 Male 35% 1.00 #
 Female 33% 0.92 (0.58–1.47)
KPS
 90–100 34% 1.00 #
 70–80 31% 0.84 (0.46–1.56)
 20–60 40% 1.29 (0.66–2.51)
Pain score
 2–4 29% 1.00 #
 5–7 34% 1.22 (0.65–2.31)
 8–10 38% 1.48 (0.76–2.90)
Visceral metastases
 No 33% 1.00 #
 Yes 38% 1.27 (0.76–2.14)
Systemic therapy
 No 38% 1.00 #
 Yes 31% 0.75 (0.47–1.20)
Treatment schedule
 6 × 4 Gy 31% 1.00 #
 1 × 8 Gy 37% 1.34 (0.84–2.15)
Pain medication
 No opioids 33% 1.00 #
 Opioids 35% 1.09 (0.68–1.75)
Spinal localization
 Thoracic spine 42% 1.00 1.00
 Thoraco-lumbar spine 39% 0.91 (0.39–2.14) 0.95 (0.40–2.25)
 Lumbar spine 27% 0.52 (0.31–0.88) 0.54 (0.32–0.91)
 Lumbo-sacral spine 55% 1.69 (0.49–5.89) 1.83 (0.52–6.49)
Treatment technique
 PA 33% 1.00 #
 APPA 37% 1.19 (0.70–2.02)

95%, CI 95% confidence interval; UV, A univariate analysis; MVA, Multivariable analysis; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; PA, Posterior-anterior field; APPA, Anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior field

aLogistic regression analysis

#Did not remain in the final model