Table 2.
Descriptive statistics for categories of theory use.
| Theory coding scheme categories (category number) | Category description (what the items in each category assess) [19] | Items included | Maximum score | Mean (SD) | Studies scoring ≥1, N |
| Reference to underpinning theory (C1) | Stated or suggested, rather than demonstrated theoretical base | 1, 2, 3 | 3 | 1.1 (1.23) | 20 |
| Targeting of relevant theoretical constructs (C2) | Whether evidence was provided that a targeted theoretical construct predicted behavior, whether theory or predictors were explicitly used for designing the intervention, and the extent to which the intervention targets particular theory-relevant constructs | 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 | 8 | 2.0 (2.43) | 17 |
| Using theory to select recipients or tailor interventions (C3) | Whether theory was used to select participants likely to benefit from the intervention, or to tailor the intervention to the needs of a particular individual | 4, 6 | 2 | 0.1 (0.26) | 2 |
| Measurement of constructs (C4) | Whether the relevant theory-based constructs or predictors have been measured | 12a, 12b | 2 | 0.5 (0.86) | 11 |
| Testing of theory: mediation effects (C5) | Whether theoretical constructs are measured, whether the intervention changes the theoretical constructs, and whether these changes explain the effect | 12a, 12b, 13, 14a, 14b, 14c, 14d, 15, 16 | 9 | 1.6 (2.83) | 14 |
| Refining theory (C6)a | Whether the results of evaluating theory-based interventions are used to refine theory | 17a, 17b | 2 | — | — |
| Total use of theory | — | All items | 22 | 4.4 (5.43) | 20 |
aNo score >0 for any studies, so not included in the meta-regression analyses.