Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 16;18:133. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3007-y

Table 5.

TMKmt Ag levels among 82 LTBI categorized as HIV+ve (46), HIV-ve (36) and NTB 9

HIV+, LTBI HIV-, LTBI NTB rTMKmt Pos. Control
Best-fit values ± SE Perfect line
 • Slope -0.001101 ± 0.0007299 0.0007494 ± 0.0007674 -0.003667 ± 0.004451 0.991
 • Y-intercept 0.2676 ± 0.0197 0.1069 ± 0.01628 0.1013 ± 0.02505 1.5045
 • X-intercept 243 -142.7 27.64 -0.01816
 • 1/slope -908 1334 -272.7 1.009
95% Confidence Intervals
 • Slope -0.002572 to 0.0003697 -0.0008101 to 0.002309 -0.01419 to 0.006859
 • Y-intercept 0.2279 to 0.3073 0.07385 to 0.14 0.0421 to 0.1606 1.009 to 2.000
 • X-intercept 117 to +infinity -infinity to -33.12 10.42 to +infinity
 • Goodness of Fit
 • R square 0.04919 0.02729 0.08837
 • Sy.x 0.06572 0.04783 0.03448
Is slope significantly non-zero?
 • F 2.276 0.9537 0.6786
 • DFn, DFd 1, 44 1, 34 1, 7
 • P value 0.1385 0.3357 0.4372
 • Deviation from zero? Not Significant Not Significant Not Significant
Equation Y = -0.001101∗X + 0.2676 Y = 0.0007494∗X + 0.1069 Y = -0.003667∗X + 0.1013 Y = 0.991∗X + 0.018
Data
 • Number of X values 46 36 9 2
 • Maximum number of Y replicates 1 1 1 1
 • Total number of values 46 36 9 2
 • Number of missing values 0 0 0 0