Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 17;20(4):20. doi: 10.1007/s11926-018-0728-2

Table 1.

Characteristics of the 193 included studies

No. of trials (%) % Enrolling malea
Overall 193 (100.0) 134 (69.4%)
Gender distribution
 Both males and females 134 (69.4) 134 (100.0%)
 Females only 50 (25.9) N/A
 Gender not reported 9 (4.7)
Location
 US included 79 (40.9) 62 (78.5)
 US not included 101 (52.3) 64 (63.4)
 Unknown 13 (6.7) 8 (61.5)
Race/ethnicity reporting
 Ethnicity only reported 5 (2.6) 3 (60.0)
 Hispanic reported as a separate race group 28 (14.5) 23 (82.1)
 Race only reported (and Hispanic ethnicity was not mentioned) 67 (34.7) 48 (71.6)
 Race and ethnicity reported as separate categories 22 (11.4) 21 (95.5)
 Neither race nor ethnicity was reported 71 (36.8) 39 (54.9)
Funding source
 Industry 72 (37.3) 58 (80.6)
 NIH 12 (6.2) 9 (75.0)
 Jointly funded 9 (4.7) 6 (66.7)
 Not stated 100 (51.8) 61 (61.0)
Total enrolment, no. of patients
 ≤ 50 84 (43.5) 51 (60.7)
 51 to 100 47 (24.4) 35 (74.5)
 101 to 200 26 (13.5) 16 (61.5)
 ≥ 200 36 (18.7) 32 (88.9)
Intervention
 Drug 174 (90.2) 127 (73.0)
 Other 19 (9.8) 7 (36.8)
Drugs under studyb
 Alkylating agent 39 (20.2) 33 (84.6)
 Biologic DMARD 45 (23.3) 44 (97.8)
 Conventional DMARD 39 (20.2) 36 (92.3)
 Glucocorticoids 22 (11.4) 18 (81.8)
 Hormonal therapy 27 (14.0) 3 (11.1)
 Other 63 (32.6) 37 (58.7)
Population
 Adults 163 (84.5) 112 (68.7)
 Pediatrics 10 (5.2) 6 (60.0)
 Both 13 (6.7) 12 (92.3)
 Unknown 7 (3.6) 4 (57.1)
Study included patients with lupus nephritis
 Yes 58 (30.1) 52 (89.7)
 No 135 (69.9) 82 (60.7)
Publication year
 1997–2001 14 (7.3) 11 (78.6)
 2002–2006 38 (19.7) 18 (47.4)
 2007–2011 58 (30.1) 43 (74.1)
 2012–2017 83 (43.0) 62 (74.7)

aThis column represents the proportion of each row that included male representation. For example, 64 (63.4%) out of 101 US-based studies included male enrollees

bThis category does not total 100% because some RCTs may evaluate more than one of these therapeutic ages