Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 2;410(10):2551–2568. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-0912-2

Table 1.

Method validation characteristics in serum

Compound Linearitya (R2) LOD (nM) Linear range (nM) RT stability (n = 3)b (RSD, %) Precision in serum (RSD, %)
Intraday Interday
C2–low C4–medium C7–high C2–low C4–medium C7–high
Lysophosphatidic acid classes
 aLPA C18:1 0.9963 1 4-533 0.79 19.9 8.8 27.3 11.5 8.5 30.1
 cLPA C18:1 0.9972 1 4-533 1.41 10.7 11.2 16.4 26.0 12.9 12.5
 LPA C20:4 0.9914 4 42-533 1.81 7.9 13.3 33.9 26.8 17.9 23.9
 LPA C16:0 0.9931 1 4-533 1.88 2.9 14.4 7.7 26.2 11.6 25.3
 LPA C18:0 0.9899 1 4-533 2.25 26.7 12.2 44.7 26.8 12.9 34.6
Sphingoids
 Sph C18:1 0.9942 1 4-533 0.13 0.3 4.8 4.9 7.5 8.2 11
 Spha C18:0 0.9966 1 4-533 0.28 21 3.3 18.8 13.6 9.8 16.7
 S1P C18:1 0.997 1 4-533 1.52 4.9 9.3 24.0 8.4 16.2 21.0
Nitro fatty acids
 NO2-OA 0.9995 0.09 0.3-173 0.04 9.9 5.7 9.1 9.2 6.0 10.4
 NO2-LA 0.9993 0.09 0.3-173 0.04 16.3 8.5 9.5 14.9 17.5 20.7
Prostaglandins
 2,3-Dinor-11b-PGF 0.9998 0.09 0.3-173 0.21 20.8 8.3 9.8 13.8 6.6 5.5
 PGE3 0.9989 0.09 0.3-173 0.26 12.2 1.6 18.9 7.0 9.2 12.6
 PGD3 0.9996 0.09 0.3-173 0.21 7.2 8.8 15.2 7.7 6.6 7.7
 PGF 0.9998 0.3 1 -173 0.17 17.2 5.4 4.9 17.0 6.6 7.1
 PGE2 0.9999 0.09 0.3-173 0.13 6.3 2.0 9.6 11.6 11.2 11.1
 PGE1 0.9996 0.3 1 -173 0.10 1.5 3.4 6.9 5.6 5.0 3.9
 PGD2 0.9991 0.09 0.3-173 0.20 1.1 2.6 1.5 1.2 2.3 1.6
 PGF 0.9995 0.09 0.3-173 0.09 29.8 13.1 18.8 89.0 15.3 12.2
 PGF 0.9987 0.09 0.3-173 0.09 15.3 6.6 6.2 8.8 5.1 5.2
 13,14-Dihydro- PGF 0.9995 0.09 0.3-173 0.20 2.6 4.7 5.2 2.9 3.4 3.7
 PGA2 0.9994 0.09 0.3-173 0.10 7.6 0.6 6.1 6.0 4.0 4.7
 PGA1 0.9995 0.09 0.3-173 0.07 1.9 0.7 5.8 2.7 7.1 5.5
Isoprostanes
 2,3-Dinor-8-iso-PGF 0.9995 0.09 0.3-173 0.25 9.5 2.7 3.6 11.4 4.3 3.9
 8-Iso-PGF 0.9995 0.3 1 -173 0.16 3.5 2.1 2.8 150.0 4.5 8.0
 8-Iso-15-keto-PGF 0.9982 0.09 0.3-173 0.20 9.1 5.3 9.2 12.2 5.8 7.5
 8-Iso-15-keto-PGE2 0.9997 1.3 5-173 0.55 38.3 2.7 6.9 24.9 2.7 3.6
 8-Iso-15-keto-PGF 0.9976 0.09 0.3-173 0.13 2.6 4.0 2.3 15.9 8.1 11.6
 iPF 0.9988 0.09 0.3-173 0.12 8.5 4.2 6.8 5.5 2.7 4.2
 8-Iso-(15R)-PGF 0.9991 0.09 0.3-173 0.12 10.4 10.2 9.7 16.3 12.1 13.8
 8-Iso-PGF 0.9989 0.09 0.3-173 0.23 1.1 4.0 3.9 3.7 4.1 3.2
 8-Iso-13,14-dihydro-PGF 0.9994 0.3 1 -173 0.11 10.6 3.7 6.4 150.8 8.8 11.6
 8-Iso-PGF 0.9993 0.09 0.3-173 0.11 8.1 5.1 5.3 9.3 5.1 6.2
 8-Iso-PGE2 0.9997 0.09 0.3-173 0.12 5.9 4.2 2.2 10.9 19.2 1.7
 8-Iso-PGE1 0.9995 0.09 0.3-173 0.15 8.2 3.8 4.8 43.6 6.9 3.9
 5iPF2α 0.9998 0.09 0.3-173 0.10 5.8 2.5 5.2 6.2 5.9 7.2
 8-Iso-PGA2 0.9994 0.09 0.3-173 0.11 4.9 1.5 5.8 5.9 4.1 4.8
 8-Iso-PGA1 0.9993 0.09 0.3-173 0.42 27.4 9.3 5.7 21.7 7.6 5.9
 8,12-iPF IV 0.9974 0.09 0.3-173 0.08 7.0 4.6 9.9 4.1 5.2 16.0

aLPA alkyl lysophosphatidic acid, cLPA cyclic lysophosphatidic acid, iP isoprostane, LA linoleic acid, LOD limit of detection, LPA lysophosphatidic acid, OA oleic acid, PG prostaglandin, RSD relative standard deviation, RT retention time, Sph sphingosine, Spha sphinganine, S1P sphingosine 1-phosphate

aCalibration curves for all standards can be found in Fig. S3.

bRT stability was calculated over three separate batches on three separate days.