Table 1. Overview of culture-independent genome sequencing methodologies applied to Chlamydiae to date.
Culture-independent approach | Non-targeted (meta)genome capture | Targeted genome capture | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method | MDA | Depletion-enrichment | Cell-sorting-MDA | IMS-MDA | Sequence capture | Multiplexed microdroplet PCR | |
Molecular basis of method (also see Fig. 1 for schematic diagram) | Isothermal strand-displacing whole genome amplification of total genomic DNA | Depletion of host methylated DNA coupled with WGA of microbial DNA supernatant by MDA | Fluorescence-assisted cell sorting coupled with WGA of isolated single cells of interest (identified by PCR) | Anti-LPS antibody binding coupled with WGA by MDA | Biotinylated RNA probe hybridization to pathogen genome ‘bait’ | Microdroplet PCR amplification of multiple DNA fragments spanning the target genome | |
Sample type(s) applied to (also see Fig. 2 for method selection) | Swab | Swab, tissue | Environmental samples | Swab stored in transport media | Swab, tissue, urine | Swabs, urine | |
Sample preparation stage at which to apply method | After total DNA extraction | After total DNA extraction | Initial sample, prior to DNA extraction | Initial sample, prior to DNA extraction | After total DNA extraction | After total DNA extraction | |
Discovery of novel species? | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | |
Detection of multiple strains/co-infection? | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
Cost per sample* | $ | $ | $$$$ | $ | $$¶ | $$$ | |
Speed* (hands on time) | <1 h§ | ~3–4 h§ | ~30 min – 2 h§ | ~5 h§ | <1 h | ~1–3 h | |
Sensitivity† | Ct value 25|| | ~1×103 genome copies per section | 315 cells [58] | 4 IFU per swab [66]; 1.1×105 genome copies (post-IMS) [65] | ~2×103 genome copies per swab [72]; 3.3×105 (urine), 5.5×106 (swab) [69] | Not reported | |
Specificity‡ | 99.6 %|| | 99 % [55] | n/a | Up to 95 % [66] | 88 % [74] | 99 % | |
Variant detection? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
Throughput | Moderate | Low | Low | High | High | Moderate | |
Limiting factors(s)/requirement(s) | Relative abundance of microbial and eukaryotic DNA in sample | Relative abundance of microbial and eukaryotic DNA in sample | Cells intact; minimal sample treatment Sample must be cryopreserved Samples in aquatic suspension are preferred |
Cells intact; minimal sample treatment Suitable characterized surface-exposed antigen Sample must be preserved in transport media |
Reference genome | Reference genome Specific bioinformatics software required |
|
Chlamydial species applied to | C. trachomatis | Ca. C. sanzinia, Ca. C. corallus, Ca. Similichlamydia epinephelii | Novel CRB species | C. trachomatis | C. trachomatis, C. pecorum, C. pneumoniae, C. psittaci | C. trachomatis | |
Reference(s) | [50] | [55–57] | [58] | [64, 65] | [69, 72, 74, 75] | [77] |
*Excluding DNA extraction and sequencing; relative cost to each other.
†Lowest amount of chlamydial DNA for 100 % genome coverage.
‡Highest percentage of non-chlamydial reads still allowing 90–100 % chlamydial genome coverage; will differ depending on sequencing platform and degree of multiplexing.
§MDA amplification step not included in time.
||Only 85 % of genome covered at least once.
¶Cost estimate for 1 : 1 bait/sample ratio.