Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 2;30(3):405–410. doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.405

Table 3. Results of anteroposterior variables.

IL UIL
Velocity (cm/s) RASs 5.67 ± 2.44 5.53 ± 2.41
controls 4.87 ± 1.06 4.47 ± 0.86

RMS distance (cm) RASs 1.29 ± 0.45 1.31 ± 0.38
controls 1.24 ± 0.29 0.92 ± 0.33b,c

Total power frequency (cm2) RASs 1.51 ± 1.58 1.54 ± 1.01
controls 1.15 ± 0.59 1.11 ± 0.89

95% edge frequency (Hz) RASs 2.08 ± 0.54 2.34 ± 0.75
controls 2.06 ± 0.58 2.46 ± 0.58

50% edge Frequency (Hz) RASs 0.46 ± 0.24 0.48 ± 0.23
controls 0.43 ± 0.22 0.54 ± 0.22

aResults of two-way ANOVA with repeated measures between groups and limbs. bResults of the paired sample t-test within limbs. cResults of independent sample t-test between groups. IL: Injured limb; UIL: Uninjured limb; RMS: Root mean square. b,cp<0.05.