Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Jan 17;22(2):503–515. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2652449

TABLE III.

Classification performance results. The positive values were MI shapes, while the negative values were AV shapes. NA denotes not available value.

AUC cutoff spec sens acc FP FN
GMPT 0.994 0.76 0.96 0.95 0.95 4 5
SSM-PLS 0.996 0.56 0.99 0.97 0.98 1 3
IC-ShapeMotion 0.989 0.42 0.96 0.98 0.97 4 2
MS 0.901 0.53 0.83 0.83 0.83 17 17
ASMSVM 0.977 0.85 0.99 0.92 0.95 1 8
FM 0.931 0.58 0.90 0.84 0.87 10 16
JCCA 0.939 0.12 0.93 0.91 0.92 7 9
RF 0.977 0.55 0.93 0.91 0.92 7 9
PT 0.991 0.29 0.92 1.00 0.96 8 0
HeAT-RDF 0.976 0.72 1.00 0.86 0.93 0 14
L2GF NA NA 0.89 0.97 0.93 11 3

Baseline 0.970 0.74 0.99 0.87 0.93 1 13

denotes a method that the AUC is statistically higher than the Baseline at p < 0.05.