Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 12;9:70. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00070

Table 3.

Differences in amygdala connectivity during the processing of cocaine and neutral cues (in cocaine users).

Cluster size # voxels Cluster p value Voxelz value Peak voxel MNI coordinates Voxel region
Left amygdala
Neutral > cocaine 792 <0.001 4.95 −60 −24 −4 L Middle temporal gyrus
4.07 −46 −18 −8 L Superior temporal gyrus
570 <0.001 4.77 −30 22 −8 L Insula
4.15 −52 18 2 L Inferior frontal gyrus
880 <0.001 4.39 54 −16 −12 Right middle temporal gyrus
4.36 60 −20 −4 R Superior temporal gyrus
774 <0.001 4.13 56 18 6 R Inferior frontal gyrus
3.72 44 18 2 R Insula
3.31 60 6 10 R Rolandic operculum
309 0.008 4.04 −58 −46 34 L Supramarginal gyrus
3.98 −60 −48 38 L Inferior parietal gyrus
Cocaine > neutral No significant clusters

Right amygdala
Neutral > cocaine 324 0.003 4.42 −28 24 −6 L Insula
3.6 −44 26 −10 L Inferior frontal gyrus
386 0.001 4.39 −48 −22 −8 L Middle temporal gyrus
209 0.023 4.12 34 44 22 L Middle frontal gyrus
3.27 22 52 24 R Superior frontal gyrus
3.23 30 36 30 R Middle frontal gyrus
195 0.03 4.04 −6 34 44 L Medial frontal gyrus
324 0.003 3.63 6 42 40 R Medial frontal gyrus
Cocaine > neutral No significant clusters

All results were p < 0.05, cluster level family-wise error corrected with an initial height threshold of p = 0.001 uncorrected.

There was no significant group by stimulus type interaction effect on functional connectivity.