Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 12;9:303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00303

Table 3.

Post-hocs analysis of shape and translation factors.

Comp. Within centered (C-C vs. S-C) Within translating (C-T vs. S-T)
SHAPE
N2 t(12) = 3.66, p = 0.005
N2c t(12) = 2.23, p = 0.005
TRANSLATION
Comp. Within canonical (C-T vs. C-C) Within scrambled (S-T vs. S-C)
N2 t(12) = −2.70, p = 0.019
N2c t(12) = 5.21, p < 0.0005

Post-hocs were performed through paired t-test, FDR corrected within each component. Single conditions are named according to the following convention: shape-translation; C-C, canonical-centered; C-T, canonical-translating.