Abstract
Rapid advances in stem cell biology and regenerative medicine have opened new opportunities for better understanding disease pathogenesis and development of new diagnostic, prognostic and treatment approaches. Many stem cell niches are well defined anatomically, thereby allowing their routine pathological evaluation during disease initiation and progression. Evaluation of consequences of genetic manipulations in stem cells, and investigation of the roles of stem cells in regenerative medicine and pathogenesis of various diseases, such as cancer, require significant expertise in pathology for accurate interpretation of novel findings. Therefore, there is an urgent need for developing stem cell pathology as a discipline to facilitate stem cell research and regenerative medicine. This review provides examples of anatomically defined niches suitable for evaluation by diagnostic pathologists, describes neoplastic lesions associated with them, and discusses further directions of stem cell pathology.
Keywords: cancer, mouse models, disease pathogenesis, stem cell biology, stem cell niches, tissue evaluation
Introduction
Stem cells are defined by two key properties: their ability to self-renew and to produce differentiated progeny (1). There are two main types of stem cells: embryonic stem cells and adult or tissue stem cells. Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent cells derived from the inner mass of blastocysts. Adult stem cells are found in various tissues, such as mammary, prostate, intestinal, follicular and ovarian surface epithelia, blood, and tissues of musculoskeletal and nervous systems. These cells sustain turnover and repair throughout life and their potency is limited to cells of that tissue. Tissue stem cells reside in a microenvironment known as the stem cell niche. Niche components interact with stem cells and play a role in their protection and cell fate decisions (2; 3).
Stem cell research covers a broad variety of topics, ranging from fundamental aspects of embryonic stem cell regulatory programs, to the basic biology of adult stem cells, to clinically-relevant aspects of tissue regeneration and disease pathogenesis. Recent years have been marked by the development of revolutionary approaches in stem cell research, such as establishment of embryonic stem cells, somatic nuclear transfer, induced cell reprogramming and interspecies chimeras (4–6). Numerous breakthroughs have been also observed in the area of translational medicine, including in vitro fertilization, tissue and organ regeneration, and uncovering the pathogenesis of many diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, neurodegeneration and many others (7; 8).
Advances in genomics, as well as the development of sophisticated tools for manipulating the vertebrate genome, have greatly enhanced our ability to develop robust animal models necessary for our understanding of fundamental mechanisms controlling stem cells and their niches (9–11). Recent development of accurate gene editing technologies has further accelerated development of relevant model systems in various species. Studies of disease pathogenesis are increasingly reliant on cell fate mapping by lineage tracing analysis in genetically modified mice (1; 3). This approach has definitively shown that many stem cell niches are well defined anatomically, thereby allowing their pathological evaluation during disease initiation and progression (12–14). Such studies require significant expertise in pathology for accurate interpretation of novel findings. Various topics of regenerative medicine and stem cell biology, such as in situ contributions of stem cells to normal and pathological regeneration, and organismal reactions to transplantations of various bioengineering constructs, remain relatively unsupported by pathologists. At the same time, stem cell research programs rarely seek out the participation of pathologists. Therefore, there is an urgent need for developing stem cell pathology as a discipline able to match the rapid advances of stem cell research and regenerative medicine. We define stem cell pathology as an area of pathology which focuses on studying the roles of stem cells in disease pathogenesis, identifies pathological consequences of stem cell transplantation, and evaluates side effects of genetic and epigenetic manipulations of stem cells.
Given appropriate training and having accurately collected and oriented material, pathologists may be able to provide their informed evaluation of potential stem cell niche defects even on routing sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Such preliminary evaluation can be further corroborated by immunohistochemistry, thereby providing a basis for further functional studies performed in collaboration with stem cell researchers.
A number of immunohistochemical markers of putative stem cells have been identified. Also, functional properties of stem cells, such as enzymatic activity (e.g., ALDH) or compound efflux (e.g., side population detected by exclusion of the DNA-binding dye Hoechst 33342) are used for detection of putative stem cells (Table 1). Unfortunately, very few, if any, of those markers are uniquely specific for stem cells. For example, expression of the detoxifying enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) family of proteins and their corresponding enzymatic activity have been identified as useful markers of stem/progenitor cells in mammary, prostate, colon, hematopoietic, neural, ovarian surface epithelium and mesenchymal cell lineages (14–18). However, this marker is also highly expressed in the liver (19) and theca cells of the ovary (14). Another approach for detecting putative stem cells is to label slowly cycling cells based on the assumption that many stem cells exhibit slow cycling. Unfortunately, it has become clear that some stem cells, such as leucine-rich-repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5)+ cells in the intestine are highly proliferative (1). Other approaches based on functional characterization of cells ex vivo such as sphere and organoid formation are also broadly used (20). Although valuable, such approaches may not always reflect biological behavior of stem cells in vivo. This problem is being addressed by the development of orthotopic transplantation assays and by the introduction of refined genetic tools for lineage tracing, thereby allowing evaluation of stem cell behavior and fate in their native environment (1; 3). Both approaches have their own challenges (Table 1), but currently represent the golden standard of stem cell identification and characterization.
Table 1.
Stem cell identification.
| Assay | Pitfalls |
|---|---|
| Immunodetection (e.g., CD44, CD49f) | Insufficiently specific |
| Functional properties, such as enzymatic activity (e.g., ALDH) or compound efflux (e.g., side population) | Insufficiently specific |
| Label retention (e.g., BrdU, H2B-GFP) | Not all stem cells are slowly cycling (e.g., LGR5+ intestinal stem cells) |
| Formation of monoclonal spheres/organoids in several consecutive rounds of dissociation and regeneration (e.g. prostaspheres) | Cell culture assays are not sufficient for the unambiguous identification of stem cells |
| Formation of a complete tissue after single cell transplantations in several consecutive rounds of dissociation and regeneration (e.g., mammary stem cells) | Under physiological conditions stem cells may have more restricted potential (e.g., prostate epithelium stem cells) |
| Cell lineage (fate) tracing (e.g., intestinal cells) | Identification of stem cell-specific promoters is a major challenge |
This review provides some examples of anatomically defined adult stem cell niches and shows their contributions to pathological processes, such as cancer. It should be noted that the concept of cancer-prone stem cells can be traced to the work of Dr. Julius Cohnheim (21), a pathologist, who proposed that malignancies may arise from “embryonic rests”, preceding the currently accepted notion that many cancers arise from stem cells and their niches by nearly a century (12; 22; 23).
Gastric epithelium
The stomach can be divided into three anatomically distinct regions. The cardia, most proximal to the esophagus; the corpus (fundus/body), which is the main part of the stomach; and the pylorus, the distal part of the stomach linking it to the duodenum (Figure 1a).
Figure 1. Stomach of adult mouse.
a. Longitudinal section of the stomach through squamous epithelium (SE), cardia including transitional zone (TZ), corpus and pylorus, followed by the proximal part of duodenum (Du). b. Transitional zone (TZ). SE, squamous epithelium. c. LGR5+ stem cells (arrow) detected by GFP immunostaining in the gastric TZ gland of Lgr5EGFP-Ires-CreERT2 mouse stomach. d. Lineage tracing of LGR5+ stem cells in the gastric epithelium at the TZ of 244 day-old Lgr5EGFP-Ires-CreERT2 Ai9 mouse stomach (14) exposed to tamoxifen at 44 days of age. All cells of the TZ gland express tdTomato (red) indicating their origin from LGR5+ stem cells. e. Dysplasia (arrows) at the TZ of Lgr5EGFP-Ires-CreERT2 p53loxP/loxP RbloxP/loxP 114 day-old mouse stomach exposed to tamoxifen at 54 days of age. f. The corpus glands of the stomach. B, base. N, neck, I, isthmus. P, pit surface. g. The pyloric glands of the stomach. h. LGR5+ stem cells (arrow) detected by GFP immunostaining at the base of the pyloric glands Lgr5EGFP-Ires-CreERT2 mouse stomach. i. Lineage tracing of LGR5+ stem cells in the pyloric epithelium of 244 day-old Lgr5EGFP-Ires-CreERT2 Ai9 mouse stomach exposed to tamoxifen at 44 days of age. All cells of a gland express tdTomato (red) indicating their origin from LGR5+ stem cells. j. Adenoma (arrows) in the pylorus of Lgr5EGFP-Ires-CreERT2 p53loxP/loxP RbloxP/loxP 382 day-old mouse stomach exposed to tamoxifen at 73 days of age. Hematoxylin and eosin staining (a, b, e, f, g, and j). ABC Elite method with hematoxylin counterstaining (c and h). Fluorescence, counterstaining with DAPI (d and i). Scale bar, 1.2 mm (a), 40 μm (b – d, and g – i), 30 μm (e), 50 μm (f), and 140 μm (j).
Cardia
The cardia includes the “epithelial transitional zone” (TZ) connecting the squamous and glandular epithelia (Figure 1b). In humans a TZ delineates the junction between the esophagus and stomach. In mice, the same TZ divides squamous and glandular regions of the stomach. In mice, expression of LGR5 marks the distinct stem cell population which resides at the base of the first gland and contributes to homeostasis of the epithelium in this region (Figure 1c and d) (24; 25). Barrett’s esophagus (BE), which is an intestine-like columnar metaplasia occurring in the stratified squamous epithelium of the distal esophagus, has been considered the precursor of gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma over the past 3 decades (26). This precancerous lesion has been suggested to result from the migration of stem cells and their progeny from the first gland of the TZ toward squamous epithelium in response to the gastroesophageal reflux (25; 27). Our studies indicate that inactivation of tumor suppressor genes Trp53 (p53) and Rb1 (Rb) in LGR5+ stem cells of the TZ leads to early dysplastic lesions progressing to metastatic gastric cancers (Figure 1e and Fu et al., unpublished observations).
Corpus
The glands of the corpus region are subdivided into four segments, pit (foveolar) surface, isthmus, neck and base, from the top to the bottom of the glands (Figure 1f). The putative stem cell population was first identified in the isthmus region of corpus glands which is characterized by highly proliferative cells lacking differentiation markers (28). Some studies have suggested that these isthmic stem cells are marked by the transcription factors, Rnt Related Transcription Factor 1 (RUNX1) and Muscle, Intestine and Stomach expression 1 (MIST1) (29; 30). Deregulation of WNT signaling and constitutive activation of oncogenic Kras in the isthmus stem cells can induce diffuse-type gastric carcinoma and precancerous foveolar metaplasia potentially progressing to intestinal-type gastric carcinoma, respectively (29; 30). In addition to the isthmus stem cell zone, the corpus glands contain distinct differentiated Troy+ chief cells at the gland base, which serve as a “reserve” stem cell population able to give rise to all corpus lineages during injury (31). Some Troy+ chief cells express the isthmus stem cell markers MIST1 and RUNX1 suggesting considerable plasticity between stem/progenitor and differentiated cells (29; 30).
Pylorus
The pyloric stem cells are marked by LGR5 expression, located at the base of glands, and contribute to daily epithelial homeostasis (Figure 1g–i) (13). Deregulation of WNT signaling activity by loss of its inhibitor APC can initiate adenoma formation in the pyloric epithelium (13). Additionally, combined inactivation of Smad4 (TGF-β mediator gene) and Pten (well-known tumor suppressor gene) in LGR5+ stem cells result in aggressive pyloric adenocarcinoma with muscular invasion (32). Interestingly, inactivation of p53 and Rb in pyloric LGR5+ cells results in adenoma formation but is insufficient for the progression to overt malignancy (Figure 1j and Fu et al., unpublished observations).
Beside the LGR5+ stem cells, Villin+ cells identified at the isthmus of pyloric glands are considered to be rare, quiescent stem/progenitor cells that become highly proliferative in response to inflammatory injury (33). The gastrin receptor, cholecystokinin B receptor (CCK2R), marks the other distinct stem/progenitor cells in the pylorus that are partially overlapping with LGR5-low-expressing (LGR5low) and LGR5-negative (LGR5neg) cells in the isthmus (34). Different from the Villin+ stem cells, the CCK2R+ isthmus cells are characterized by rapid proliferation and ability to maintain the epithelial renewal for at least 12 months (34). Progastrin, which is a precursor of gastrin secreted by neuroendocrine G-cells in the pylorus, can convert CCK2R+ isthmus cells into LGR5high base stem cells and also facilitate pyloric cancer development (34). Additional putative stem cell markers, such as SOX2 and RUNX1, are also expressed by isthmus cells of pyloric glands (30; 35).
Intestinal epithelium
The intestinal epithelium is one of the most regenerative tissues in the body being entirely renewed every 3–5 days (36). This rapid turnover process is fueled by the stem cell components residing close to the base of crypts of Lieberkühn (aka intestinal crypts, Figure 2a). The intestinal stem cells near the crypt base continuously produce rapidly proliferative progenitors called transit-amplifying (TA) cells, which are able to migrate out of the crypts onto villi and simultaneously differentiate into various types of cells responsible for food digestion, nutrition absorption, and disease defense.
Figure 2. Small intestine of adult mouse.

a. The epithelium of small intestine. The +4 slow cycling stem cell (arrow) is located above the stem cell zone (SCZ) at the base of the intestinal crypts (C). V, villous. b. LGR5+ stem cells (arrows) detected by GFP immunostaining in the intestinal crypts of Lgr5EGFP-Ires-CreERT2 mouse small intestine. c. Epithelial hyperplasia (arrow) in the small intestine of Lgr5EGFP-Ires-CreERT2 p53loxP/loxP RbloxP/loxP 276 day-old mouse exposed to tamoxifen at 41 day of age. Hematoxylin and eosin (a and c). ABC Elite method with hematoxylin counterstaining (b). Scale bar, 25 μm all images.
Two types of adult intestinal stem cells have been proposed over the past four decades. In the “+4 model” introduced in 1965 (37), the putative stem cells are located at the forth position (+4) from the crypt base (Figure 2a), which reside directly above the Paneth compartment. These cells were later described as “quiescent stem cells” due to their infrequent or asymmetric division properties (38; 39). The biomarkers, such as B lymphoma Mo-MLV Insertion region 1 homolog (BMI1) (40), Mouse Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (mTERT) (41), Homeodomain-only protein (HOPX) (42), and Leucine Rich Repeats and Immunoglobulin like Domains 1 (LRIG1) can be used to identify these slow-cycling +4 cells (43).
In the “stem cell zone” model introduced in 1974, active rapidly cycling “Crypt Base Columnar” (CBC) stem cells represent a population of slender columnar cells interspersed between Paneth cells at the intestinal crypt bases (44; 45 and Figure 2a). These CBC stem cells are long-lived and multipotent, and divide once every day to maintain the daily epithelial homeostasis (46; 47). Some biomarkers, including LGR5 (Figure 2b) (48), Achaete Scute-Like2 (ASCL2) (49), Olfactomedin-4 (OLFM4) (50), Prominin 1 (PROM1/CD133) (51), Activated Leukocyte Cell adhesion Molecule (ALCAM/CD166) (52), SPARC Related Modular Calcium Binding 2 (SMOC2) (53), and Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily member 19 (TNFRSF19/Troy) (54) have been used for the identification of CBC cells in intestinal crypts.
Recent cell lineage tracing and ablation experiments support the existence of both the +4 and CBC stem cells. The regular epithelial homeostasis is maintained by the active CBC cells. However, during tissue injury, the damage-resistant +4 cells become activated and contribute to the entire crypt regeneration including restoration of CBC cells that are lost by damage (42; 55).
The adult intestinal stem cell has been thought of as the cell of origin of intestinal cancer for decades. Recently, a variety of cell type-specific marker-driven Cre recombinase mouse models suggest that inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, such as Apc and p53 in the intestinal stem/progenitor cells (i.e. LGR5+, BMI1+, CD133+ or LRIG1+ cells) is sufficient to initiate multiple tumor formation or epithelial hyperplasia (40; 43 and Figure 2c; 51; 56). However, similar mutations occurring in the differentiated intestinal cells are unable to initiate carcinogenesis. These experiments suggest a greater susceptibility of intestinal stem cells to cancer in comparison to their differentiated progenies.
Ovarian surface epithelium
The ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) undergoes extensive damage and regeneration during ovulation. Using label retention assays based on incorporation of 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine/5-iodo-2′deoxyuridine (BrdU/IdU) and histone-GFP fusion protein retention in H2B-GFP transgenic mice, Szotek and colleagues identified putative stem cells as slowly-cycling cells in the OSE (57). These cells proliferated in response to the estrous cycle, showed enhanced colony forming ability in cell culture, and were able to exclude Hoechst 33342. Another putative OSE stem cell population was reported based on expression of stem cell marker LY6A (SCA-1) (58). Unfortunately, it has been uncertain if these cells have potential for long-term self-renewal and contribute to OSE regeneration in vivo, key features of stem cells. Furthermore, the anatomical location of such cells remained unknown. The issues have been addressed in a more recent study which identified the OSE-stem cell population able to efficiently form clonal spheres, to display extended self-renewal properties in serial sphere generation assay, and to contribute to OSE regeneration in long-term lineage tracing assays (14). These cells express stem cell markers ALDH1, LGR5, LEF1, CD133, and CK6B. Furthermore, OSE-stem cells have low levels of microRNAs of the miR-34 family (miR-34a, b and c), which negatively regulate stem cell properties of adult stem cells (59). Interestingly, these cells are mainly located in the hilum area of the mouse ovary (Figure 3). This area represents the transitional/junctional zone between the OSE, the tubal epithelium (TE) and the mesothelium. At the same time, lineage tracing analysis in Lgr5EGFP-Ires-CreERT Gt(ROSA)26Sortm9(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J (Ai9) mice also determined that LGR5+ OSE stem cells do not contribute to the regeneration of the TE, thereby suggesting presence of a separate stem cell niche in charge of this function (14). Similar results confirming location of LGR5+ cells in the OSE of the hilum area but not in the TE of adult mice were recently reported by the Barker group (60).
Figure 3. Ovary of adult mouse.
a. Longitudinal section of the ovary and adnexa. The hilum area (H) contains the transitional zone between the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) and mesothelium or tubal epithelium (arrow in the bottom panel). b. ALDH1 (brown) is expressed preferentially in the OSE (arrows) of the hilum region (H) as compared to other regions. ALDH1 staining is also present in the theca cells (TC) of the ovary (OV). c. Early atypical OSE lesions (arrow) in the hilum region of p53loxP/loxP RbloxP/loxP mouse ovary 60 days after trans-infundibular intrabursal injection of AdCre. The lesions are characterized by increased nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio, nuclear size and shape variability, more columnar appearance, and cell crowding. OV, ovary. B, bursa, U, uterus. UT, uterine tube. Rectangles in the top panels indicate respective location of the bottom panels. Hematoxylin and eosin (a and c). ABC Elite method with hematoxylin counterstaining (b). Scale bar, 600 μm (top panels) and 120 μm (bottom panels).
Inactivation of p53 and Rb tumor suppressor genes, whose pathways are frequently altered in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (61), results in preferential proliferation, immortalization, and malignant transformation of the hilar OSE cells. These results provide direct experimental evidence that this most common and aggressive type of ovarian cancer may arise from the stem cell niche, and neoplasms originating from stem/progenitor cells have a particularly aggressive behavior.
Prostate epithelium
Normal prostate epithelium is composed of three main cell types: basal, luminal neuroendocrine. Luminal cells express Keratin (KRT) 8, KRT18, Prostate specific antigen (PSA) and high levels of androgen receptor (AR), and are dependent on androgen for survival. Basal cells express p63, KRT5, KRT14 and low level of AR, and are androgen responsive but androgen independent for survival (62; 63). Neuroendocrine cells express chromogranin A and synaptophysin, and lack AR and PSA (64).
Although the overall organization of the rodent prostate differs from that of the human gland, it provides a unique opportunity to study many important features of the prostate, including the localization and properties of prostate stem/progenitor cells. The mouse prostate is composed of a series of branching ducts, each containing distal, intermediate, and proximal regions relative to the urethra (65 and Figure 4a and b). Proliferating, transit-amplifying cells are preferentially located in the distal region of the prostatic ducts, whereas cells with stem cell-like properties, such as low cycling rate, self-renewal ability, and high ex vivo proliferative potential, mainly reside in the proximal region of the prostatic ducts (59; 66–69). Furthermore, the latter cells were shown to share with stem cells of other organs the expression of specific antigens such as SCA-1, α6 integrin, and BCL-2 (69 and Figure 4c; 70; 71), and to survive prolonged androgen deprivation (72; 73). Thus, approaches based on the isolation of cells according to their displayed stem cell-specific markers can be complemented by careful evaluation of stem cell compartments in situ. Interestingly, the majority of neuroendocrine cells are located in the proximal regions of prostatic ducts and their ablation results in prostate hypotrophy (74). Their potential role in the regulation of prostate stem cells remains to be investigated. The adult prostate epithelium is mainly sustained by unipotential luminal and basal progenitors (75–77). However, bipotential Nkx3.1-expressing luminal population has also been identified in regenerating prostate epithelium (78).
Figure 4. Prostate of adult mouse.
a and b. Transverse section of the prostate. The periurethral part of the prostate is located inside of the muscular layer (M) and contains the proximal region of the prostatic ducts (P in a, arrow in b). D, distal region of the prostatic ducts. c. Epithelial cells of the proximal region (P), but not those of the distal region (D) of the prostatic ducts, highly express SCA-1 (arrows). d and e. Adenocarcinoma invading the surrounding stroma (arrow) and filling up the lumen in the proximal regions of the prostatic ducts of p53PE−/− mir-34PE−/− mouse prostate (59). The rectangles in a and d indicate respective locations of b and e. Hematoxylin and eosin (a, b and d). ABC Elite method with hematoxylin counterstaining (c). Scale bar, 200 μm (a, c and d) and 60 μm (b and e).
Experimental evidence based on mouse models suggest that prostate cancers arise from stem/progenitor cells (59; 69; 70; 78–81). The earliest lesions and invasive neoplasms were detected in the proximal regions of the prostatic ducts in several mouse models of prostate cancer. For example, the earliest morphological precursors of metastatic carcinomas were detected in the proximal regions of prostatic ducts of mice with prostate epithelium-specific inactivation of p53 and Rb by postnatal day 60 (69). In this model, androgen withdrawal-independent neoplasms were also detected in the proximal regions of prostatic ducts in mice castrated at postnatal day 60 and sacrificed 100 days afterwards (69). Numerous dysplastic foci (prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia) were also found in the distal region of prostatic ducts of these mice. However, these lesions never progressed to invasive or metastatic carcinoma by the time of death caused by rapidly growing carcinomas arising from the proximal regions of prostatic ducts. The absence of functional p53 and Rb genes in the cells of both proximal and distal prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was confirmed by microdissection-PCR (69). Thus, differences in biological behavior of PIN as a function of their location cannot be explained by incomplete inactivation of either of these genes.
Similarly, early invasive adenocarcinomas in the proximal but not distal regions of the prostatic ducts were observed in mice with prostate epithelium-specific inactivation of mir-34 and p53 (59 and Figure 4d and e). Accordingly, inactivation of these genes resulted in expansion of the prostate stem cell niche. Taken together these results indicate that transformation of stem cells may result in particularly aggressive prostate cancers.
Skin
The skin is a complex organ which contains several types of stem cells, including epithelial and melanocytic stem cells. The epithelial stem cells are found in the hair follicle, interfollicular epithelium and sebaceous gland. Melanocytic stem cells are found in the hair follicle in mouse and in hair follicle and epidermis in human.
The epithelial hair follicle stem cells are the best understood and are confined to a region of the hair follicle known as the lower permanent portion or bulge (82 and Figure 5a and b). Hair follicle growth occurs in cycles, and prior to the growth activation phase, stem cells migrate outside the bulge for the beginning of the new bulb of the hair follicle, known as hair germ. These hair germ cells divide and differentiate to form the hair shaft (cuticle, cortex and medulla) and the inner root sheath. The outer root sheath is also derived from the stem cells in the bulge during the growth phase. Cells in the dermal papilla secrete growth factors, including fibroblast growth factors (FGF)-7 and 10, transforming growth factor (TGF)-b2, and noggin, which are important in initiating proliferation of the primed cells. WNT signaling also plays a role in activation of primed stem cells in the hair germ, while sonic hedgehog signaling is a potent mitogen for stem cells in the bulge promoting their self-renewal. Markers of follicular stem cells in mice and humans include Tenascin C, CD200, KRT15, and KRT19 (83; 84). Additional markers in mice include MACF1, ß1 integrin and ß6 integrin, α6 integrin and CD34 (82; 85; 86).
Figure 5. Skin of adult mice.

a. Longitudinal section of the skin and hair follicles. E, epidermis. H, hair shaft. HG, hair germ. D, dermal papillae. B, bulge. S, sebaceous gland. b. Immunostaining of CD34 (red) and H2B label-retaining stem cells (green). c. Squamous cell carcinoma (S) at the back skin of Lgr5EGFP-Ires-CreERT2 p53loxP/loxP 538 day-old mouse exposed to tamoxifen at 55 days of age. HF, remnants of hair follicle. Hematoxylin and eosin staining (a and c). Immunofluorescence with DAPI counterstaining (b). Scale bar, 55 μm (a), 30 μm (b) and 100 μm (c).
Within the intra-follicular epidermis, stem cells are located in the stratum basale (or basal layer), and their identity and precise organization remains unclear. Originally it was thought that the stem cells are rare and produce transit-amplifying rapidly dividing cells that differentiate into hexagonal columns of cells called epidermal proliferative units. In human these stem cells express high levels of ß1 integrins (87) and MCSP, Delta1, and LRIG 1 (87–89). Recent work in mice, including lineage tracing and live imaging challenged this view, proposing instead that most cells in the basal layer are stem cells, which stochastically may choose to differentiate or self-renew (90; 91). The recent discovery of multiple populations of independent stem cells, which are spatially segregated, complicates matters even more (92). The mature keratinocytes are suprabasal, and sequentially populate the stratum spinosum (expressing KRT1 and 10), stratum granulosum (expressing involucrin and loricrin), and stratum corneum. Cells in the stratum basale are attached to the basement membrane by integrins α3ß1 and α6ß4 and proliferate in response to growth factors secreted by fibroblasts in the dermis. These factors include FGF7 and 10, insulin-like growth factor, epidermal growth factor receptor ligands and TGFα. Differentiation of epidermal stem cells is dependent on NOTCH signaling. Specifically NOTCH1, 2 and 3 receptors are expressed in the suprabasilar keratinocytes of mice. NOTCH ligand Jagged1 is also expressed in the suprabasilar keratinocytes, while Jagged2 is expressed in the stratum basale cells. Notch activation promotes asymmetric division of stratum basale cells. This division along a plane parallel to the basement membrane ensures upward stratification of the differentiating cells.
In addition to the follicular and inter-follicular stem cells, some studies suggest that sebaceous glands also contain a population of epithelial stem cells. These stem cells are located in the basal layer of the gland and express BLIMP1 (93). The interfollicular, follicular and sebaceous gland stem cells are considered interchangeable and functionally identical under stress conditions (94). Recently, LGR6+ cells were found in the region located directly above the follicle bulge, known as the infundibullum. Prenatally these cells established the hair follicle, sebaceous gland, and interfollicular epidermis. Postnatally, LGR6+ cells mainly generated sebaceous gland and interfollicular epidermis, but were able of formation of new hair follicle during long-term wound repair (95).
Epidermal tumors include basal cell carcinoma, squamous cells carcinoma, follicular and sebaceous neoplasia. Selective expression of oncogenes in differentiated cells leads to formation of benign tumors, such as papillomas, while expression in the proliferating cells of the follicle results in malignant carcinoma (96; 97). Similarly, inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, such as p53 and Pten, in LGR5+ hair follicle stem cells results in formation of squamous cell carcinomas (Figure 5c and Fu et al., unpublished results).
Melanocytes, along with peripheral neurons and endocrine cells, are derived from neural crest cells. Melanoblasts, the precursor cells for melanocytes, migrate from the neural crest to the epidermis and hair follicles, and to other areas in the body including the iris of the eye and cochlea of the ear. In hair follicles, the melanoblasts are located in the hair matrix and the bulge region. Following injury, these stem cells migrate from the bulge to the epidermis, where they proliferate to produce melanocytes. Melanocyte stem cell migration and differentiation is regulated by binding of ligands to the melanocortin-1 receptor. Self-renewal of these stem cells is dependent on expression of collagen XVII by adjacent epithelial stem cells. Migratory melanoblasts express DCT, MITF1, KIT, PAX3, SOX10, SI, TYR and TYRP1, while melanocyte stem cells in the bulge express DCT and PAX3, with downregulation of other markers (98). Differentiated melanocytes express DCT, MITF1, KIT, PAX3, SOX10 (98). A population of neural crest stem cell (NCSC)-like cells is maintained in the dermal papilla and replenish melanocytes in the epidermis after age-related loss of stem cells in the bulge. These cells express neural crest markers such as Nestin, Twist and Slug (99), and will differentiate into melanocytes following UV damage and increased production of WNT ligands by keratinocytes.
Melanomas, neoplasms of melanocytic cells, may arise from de-differentiated melanocytes, melanocyte stem cells, or multipotential NCSC-like cells. The proliferation and basilar location of melanocytes are controlled by interactions with keratinocytes. Removal of melanocytes from this microenvironment results in increased cell division and altered adhesion molecule expression, characteristics similar to those of melanoma cells (100). Following UV damage, keratinocytes secrete growth factors for melanocytes (101), as well as pro-inflammatory cytokines (102), both of which can contribute to malignant transformation.
The nervous system
The coordinated development of neurons, glia, and supporting cells is fundamentally controlled and impacted by the role of neural stem cells (NSCs). While limited in the adult animal, coordinated neurogenesis still occurs in certain regions of the brain, namely the hippocampus, subventricular zone (SVZ), and olfactory cortex, where NSCs drive neurogenesis. NSCs are multipotent cells that give rise to neurons as well as neuroglia (oligodendrocytes and astrocytes) (103). In the developing animal, abundant proliferation of NSCs occur in the peri-ventricular tissue where initial NSC division occurs. From this population, precursor cells derived from NSCs migrate to the SVZ and then to the gray matter structures of the CNS where they mature (103). While neurons are the initial result of NSC replication, glial cells are also abundantly produced and migrate to populate the entire CNS during development. The spatial production, development, and maturation of neurons and glia from the NSCs requires a coordinated effort of large numbers of transcription factors and trophic factors, many of which remain to be elucidated.
The SVZ is a primary niche for NSCs in the adult mammalian brain (Figure 6a and b). They are located immediately subjacent to the ependyma where they are referred to as B1 astrocytes, identified via advanced microscopy as having chromatin clumping close to the nuclear membrane and a cilium that communicates with the lateral ventricle (104). These cells proliferate and give rise to intermediate progenitor cells that eventually form neuroblasts. As the mammalian subject ages, there is a profound decline in the proliferative capabilities of NSCs; however, small numbers of NSCs are found in the dentate gyrus and the SVZ of the adult aged brain (104). The role that aging has in changing the plasticity of NSCs is not fully understood; however, this is an area of active interest.
Figure 6. Canine and mouse brain.
a. Canine brain, Cross section through frontal cortex of the canine brain. Subventricular zone (SVZ) containing stem/progenitor cells is indicated by the arrow. b. The SOX2-expressing stem/progenitor cells (arrowheads in the inset) at the subventricular zone (arrow). The rectangles in b and c indicate respective locations of the insets. C, frontal cortex, V, lateral ventricle (C). c. Canine glioma (arrow). The neoplastic glial cells are strongly immunoreactive for SOX2. d. Glioblastoma multiforme (arrow) in the SVZ of p53+/−, Nf1+/−mouse brain. Hematoxylin and eosin staining (a and d). ABC elite method with hematoxylin counterstaining (b and c). Scale bar, 5 mm (a – c), 100 μm (insets in b and c, and d).
A second emerging concept in CNS stem cell pathology, is the role that stem cells play in tumor formation (104). Most of the research on this topic has focused on high-grade astrocytomas due to their increased frequency in the human population and their significant morbidity and mortality. The glioma stem cells share some similarities with the NSCs including expression of NSCs markers (i.e. CD133, SOX2, nestin) and the ability to self-renew and proliferate (105). These glioma stem cells respond to their own set of cues derived from the cancer niche and include select transcription factors, local hypoxia, and epigenetic alterations. Little is known regarding the stem cell niche of glioma in animal species; however, the dog is an attractive model to explore (106 and Figure 6c). The neuroanatomical localization of canine gliomas (oligodendroglioma and astrocytoma specifically) often to the peri-ventricular tissue suggests a potential role for emergence from the SVZ. Further research into the role of stem cell proliferation in canine glioma is justified; however, reagents commonly used to identify either NSCs or glioma stem cells rarely work in the dog making identification more challenging. Numerous rodent models have been employed to study gliomagenesis with respect to stem cell pathology; (107; 108 and Figure 6d).
Transitional zones, stem cells and cancer
Transitional zones (TZ)/junction areas are anatomically defined regions of organs where two different types of epithelial tissue meet. It is well known that many TZs, such as the gastro-esophageal, anal canal, uterine cervical and corneal limbus junctions are highly susceptible to cancer (109–112). The presence of adult stem cells in such junctions has been definitively demonstrated for the corneal limbus region (113; 114 and Table 2), the gastric squamo-columnar junction (45; 115; 116 and Figure 1) and the ovarian hilum region (14 and Figure 3). Putative stem/progenitor cells have been identified in the anal canal (117) and the uterine cervix (118; 119).
Table 2.
Examples of stem cell niches in transitional/junction zones
| Location | Species | Assays | Niche markers | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anorectal junction | Mouse | Label retention, IHC | CD34, integrin α6, SOX2, p63, Tenascin C | (117) |
| Corneal limbus | Human Mouse | Histology, IHC, cell culture, transplantation, wounding | ABCG2, KRT14, p63, ABCB5 | (114; 131; 132) |
| Gastric squamo-columnar junction | Human Mouse | Histology, IHC, label retention, chemical random mutagenesis, lineage-tracing | LGR5, CD44 | (13; 27; 115; 133) |
| Cervical squamo-columnar junction | Human | Gene-expression arrays, histology, IHC, western blotting | AGR2, CD63, GDA, KRT7, MMP7 | (118; 119) |
| Ovarian hilum | Mouse | FACS, label retention, lineage-tracing, sphere/clonal formation, gene expression arrays, IHC, qRT-PCR, laser microdissection, transplantation | ALDH1, LGR5, LEF1, CD133, KRT6B | (14) |
Abbreviations: IHC, immunohistochemistry; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; qRT-PCR, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
For the most of these locations, the definitive proof that TZ stem/progenitor cells are more susceptible to malignant transformation as compared to their more differentiated progeny remains to be shown. Indeed, it is possible that some neoplasms may originate from differentiated cells which have acquired some stem cell properties (120; 121). However, recent work has provided the first direct experimental evidence that high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas may develop from the hilum area, which is TZ between OSE, mesothelium and TE, in the mouse (14). Another study demonstrated that the majority of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, the likely precursor of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, are frequently located in the vicinity of tubal-peritoneal junctions, which are TZs between TE and mesothelium (122). Importantly, both tubal-peritoneal junctions and serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma express stem cell marker LEF1 (123). These finding may offer an equivalent to the cancer-prone stem cell niche in the mouse hilum area. They also support the notion that cancer susceptibility of TZs in other organs may be explained by cancer-prone stem cell niches therein.
Another important question is whether TZ stem cells are more prone to malignant transformation than stem cells located in other regions of the same tissue and organ. As shown in the Stomach section of this manuscript, our studies suggest that this is the case. The mechanisms responsible for this uneven susceptibility remain to be understood.
Cancer propagating/stem cells
Cancer cells frequently acquire stem cell-like properties. In many cases, such properties are specifically associated with subpopulations of cancer cells known as cancer propagating cells (CPC), cancer stem cells or cancer-imitating cells (124–127). Such cells are characterized by their ability for long-term self-renewal, high potential for proliferation, high tumorigenicity, and capacity to recreate the complexity of the original tumors. They also frequently show increased chemoresistance; therefore, they may play a significant role in cancer recurrence (125; 127). Thus it is tempting to attempt detection of CPCs in tissue sections. However it should be taken into account that stem cell marker expression is frequently unstable due to the phenotypical plasticity of cancer (128–130). Thus, the use of immunostainings for detection of putative CPCs should be performed in conjunction with their functional characterization.
Future issues and challenges
The majority of studies of stem cell niches are focused on mice and other experimental animals. Since anatomy and physiology of humans are frequently quite distinct from other animals delineating stem cell niches in human tissues is of the utmost importance. At the same time, new animal models need to be prepared to allow specific targeting of not only a specific cell type, but also a specific stage along the continuum of cell lineage development, from stem cells to their differentiated progeny.
With increase in the development of regenerative medicine approaches, pathology needs to be more focused on systematic assessment of complications of stem cell transplantation. Furthermore, side effects of genetic and epigenetic manipulations of gametes, ES, iPS and adult stem cells remain to be better evaluated. Discovery of novel stem cell niches in the TZs and other anatomically defined areas is another task requiring pathologists. It is also important to understand why some stem cell populations reside in specific locations such as TZa and how such locations contribute to pathogenesis of various diseases, including cancer.
Addressing the growing needs of pathological support in stem cell research and regenerative medicine studies, specialized training of pathologists in stem cell pathology is required. It would be also helpful to establish sections/units of diagnostic pathology specializing in stem cell pathology. In case of research institutions, such sections should be staffed by comparative pathologists who are also experienced in animal models. Such pathologists should be in charge of the development of approaches for accurate collection and orientation of specimens allowing evaluation of stem cell niches. We provide an example of such approaches for some mouse tissues used by the Cornell Stem Cell Pathology Unit (Table 3). Since the majority of stem cells can be detected only by a combination of several markers, development of multiplexed immunohistochemical and molecular biological approaches should be another task of such sections. We anticipate that close integration of stem cell pathology with animal modeling and in vivo imaging will significantly accelerate our progress towards understanding the pathogenesis of diseases associated with stem cell niche disorders.
Table 3.
Specimen collection for pathological evaluation of stem cell niches in the mouse
| Organ | Location of interest | Recommended orientation of section | Tissue preparation | Ref.* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stomach | Base and isthmus of glands | Longitudinal vertical section from forestomach through TZ, corpus, pylorus to duodenum | The stomach is opened along the greater curvature, spread and pinned on cork, and placed into fixative. The flat, fixed stomach tissue is longitudinally dissected into 1 mm- wide strips followed by routine tissue processing. The gastric strips are embedded cut side down. | (134) |
| Intestine | Intestinal crypts | Longitudinal horizontal section of “Swiss rolled” intestine | The intestine is cut into several segments, opened longitudinally and rolled up on a wooden stick. The rolled intestine tissue is removed from stick and fixed. | (135) |
| Prostate | Proximal regions of prostatic ducts | Transverse section of all lobes including periurethral area | Entire genitourinary block is removed after transection of the urethra. Transverse sectioning through urethra should include periurethral area, and dorsolateral and ventral prostatic lobes | (136) |
| Ovary | Hilum region | Longitudinal section | The ovary is removed from the abdomen and left attached with a small segment of oviduct. The specimen is gently sandwiched between foamy biopsy sponges or filter paper without any compression, and fixed. | (14) |
| Brain | Sub ventricular zone | Serial transverse section from middle to caudal of cerebrum | The whole cerebrum is removed from skull and fixed. After fixation, the cerebrum is transversely dissected into several slices. | (137) |
| Eye | Limbus region | Longitudinal vertical section | The excess tissue is trimmed off the eye globe. The globe is fixed in modified Davison’s fixative. | (138) |
| Skin | Hair follicle | Longitudinal section along with the hair flow | A square of skin flap is removed from the body, pinned out and fixed. The fixed skin flap is trimmed into strips and embedded cut side down. | (139) |
Abbreviation: Ref. Reference
Acknowledgments
We thank Tera Kent for the excellent help with preparing virtual digital slides for this work, and Dr. Tudorita Tumbar for the critical reading of our manuscript and images for Figure 5a and b. This work was supported by grants from NIH/NCI (CA182413 and CA197160), NYSTEM (C028125 and C029155) and Ovarian Cancer Research Fund (327516).
Footnotes
Disclosure statement
The authors are not aware of any affiliations, memberships, funding, or financial holdings that might be perceived as affecting the objectivity of this review.
References
- 1.Snippert HJ, Clevers H. Tracking adult stem cells. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:113–22. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hsu YC, Fuchs E. A family business: stem cell progeny join the niche to regulate homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13:103–14. doi: 10.1038/nrm3272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blanpain C, Fuchs E. Stem cell plasticity. Plasticity of epithelial stem cells in tissue regeneration. Science. 2014;344:1242281-1-10. doi: 10.1126/science.1242281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yamanaka S, Blau HM. Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches. Nature. 2010;465:704–12. doi: 10.1038/nature09229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wu J, Greely HT, Jaenisch R, Nakauchi H, Rossant J, Belmonte JC. Stem cells and interspecies chimaeras. Nature. 2016;540:51–9. doi: 10.1038/nature20573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shi Y, Inoue H, Wu JC, Yamanaka S. Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: a decade of progress. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:115–30. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Doulatov S, Daley GQ. Development. A stem cell perspective on cellular engineering. Science. 2013;342:700–2. doi: 10.1126/science.1238363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McKernan R, Watt FM. What is the point of large-scale collections of human induced pluripotent stem cells? Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:875–7. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dow LE, Lowe SW. Life in the fast lane: Mammalian disease models in the genomics era. Cell. 2012;148:1099–109. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.HogenEsch H, Nikitin AY. Challenges in pre-clinical testing of anti-cancer drugs in cell culture and in animal models. J Control Release. 2012;164:183–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.02.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Day CP, Merlino G, Van Dyke T. Preclinical mouse cancer models: a maze of opportunities and challenges. Cell. 2015;163:39–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schepers AG, Snippert HJ, Stange DE, van den Born M, van Es JH, et al. Lineage tracing reveals Lgr5+ stem cell activity in mouse intestinal adenomas. Science. 2012;337:730–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1224676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Barker N, Huch M, Kujala P, van de Wetering M, Snippert HJ, et al. Lgr5(+ve) stem cells drive self-renewal in the stomach and build long-lived gastric units in vitro. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Flesken-Nikitin A, Hwang C-I, Cheng C-Y, Michurina TV, Enikolopov G, Nikitin AY. Ovarian surface epithelium at the junction area contains a cancer-prone stem cell niche. Nature. 2013;495:241–5. doi: 10.1038/nature11979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Dutcher J, et al. ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:555–67. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Storms RW, Trujillo AP, Springer JB, Shah L, Colvin OM, et al. Isolation of primitive human hematopoietic progenitors on the basis of aldehyde dehydrogenase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:9118–23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Corti S, Locatelli F, Papadimitriou D, Donadoni C, Salani S, et al. Identification of a primitive brain-derived neural stem cell population based on aldehyde dehydrogenase activity. Stem Cells. 2006;24:975–85. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Burger PE, Gupta R, Xiong X, Ontiveros CS, Salm SN, et al. High aldehyde dehydrogenase activity: a novel functional marker of murine prostate stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27:2220–8. doi: 10.1002/stem.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Crabb DW, Matsumoto M, Chang D, You M. Overview of the role of alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase and their variants in the genesis of alcohol-related pathology. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63:49–63. doi: 10.1079/pns2003327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Clevers H. Modeling development and disease with organoids. Cell. 2016;165:1586–97. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cohnheim J. Ueber entzundung und eiterung. Path Anat Physiol Klin Med. 1867;40:1–79. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Visvader JE. Cells of origin in cancer. Nature. 2011;469:314–22. doi: 10.1038/nature09781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Medema JP, Vermeulen L. Microenvironmental regulation of stem cells in intestinal homeostasis and cancer. Nature. 2011;474:318–26. doi: 10.1038/nature10212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.O’Neil A, Petersen CP, Choi E, Engevik AC, Goldenring JR. Unique cellular lineage composition of the first gland of the mouse gastric corpus. Journal of Histochem Cytochem. 2017;65:47–58. doi: 10.1369/0022155416678182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Quante M, Bhagat G, Abrams JA, Marache F, Good P, et al. Bile acid and inflammation activate gastric cardia stem cells in a mouse model of Barrett-like metaplasia. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:36–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Reid BJ, Weinstein WM. Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma. Ann Rev Medicine. 1987;38:477–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.38.020187.002401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang X, Ouyang H, Yamamoto Y, Kumar PA, Wei TS, et al. Residual embryonic cells as precursors of a Barrett's-like metaplasia. Cell. 2011;145:1023–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Karam SM, Leblond CP. Dynamics of epithelial cells in the corpus of the mouse stomach. I. Identification of proliferative cell types and pinpointing of the stem cell. The Anatomical Record. 1993;236:259–79. doi: 10.1002/ar.1092360202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hayakawa Y, Ariyama H, Stancikova J, Sakitani K, Asfaha S, et al. Mist1 expressing gastric stem cells maintain the normal and neoplastic gastric epithelium and are supported by a perivascular stem cell niche. Cancer Cell. 2015;28:800–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Matsuo J, Kimura S, Yamamura A, Koh CP, Hossain MZ, et al. Identification of stem cells in the epithelium of the stomach corpus and antrum of mice. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:218–31e14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stange DE, Koo B-K, Huch M, Sibbel G, Basak O, et al. Differentiated Troy(+) chief cells act as reserve stem cells to generate all lineages of the stomach epithelium. Cell. 2013;155:357–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li X-B, Yang G, Zhu L, Tang Y-L, Zhang C, et al. Gastric Lgr5(+) stem cells are the cellular origin of invasive intestinal-type gastric cancer in mice. Cell Res. 2016;26:838–49. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Qiao XT, Ziel JW, McKimpson W, Madison BB, Todisco A, et al. Prospective identification of a multilineage progenitor in murine stomach epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1989–98. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.09.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hayakawa Y, Jin G, Wang H, Chen X, Westphalen CB, et al. CCK2R identifies and regulates gastric antral stem cell states and carcinogenesis. Gut. 2015;64:544–53. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arnold K, Sarkar A, Yram MA, Polo JM, Bronson R, et al. Sox2(+) adult stem and progenitor cells are important for tissue regeneration and survival of mice. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9:317–29. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Leblond CP, STEVENS CE. The constant renewal of the intestinal epithelium in the albino rat. The Anatomical Record. 1948;100:357–77. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091000306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cairnie AB, Lamerton LF, Steel GG. Cell proliferation studies in the intestinal epithelium of the rat: I. Determination of the kinetic parameters. Exp Cell Res. 1965;39:528–38. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90055-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Potten CS, Gandara R, Mahida YR, Loeffler M, Wright NA. The stem cells of small intestinal crypts: where are they? Cell proliferation. 2009;42:731–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2009.00642.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Potten CS. Extreme sensitivity of some intestinal crypt cells to X and γ irradiation. Nature. 1977;269:518–21. doi: 10.1038/269518a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sangiorgi E, Capecchi MR. Bmi1 is expressed in vivo in intestinal stem cells. Nature Genet. 2008;40:915–20. doi: 10.1038/ng.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Montgomery RK, Carlone DL. Mouse telomerase reverse transcriptase (mTert) expression marks slowly cycling intestinal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:179–84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013004108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Takeda N, Jain R, LeBoeuf MR, Wang Q, Lu MM, Epstein JA. Interconversion between intestinal stem cell populations in distinct niches. Science. 2011;334:1420–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1213214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Powell AE, Wang Y, Li Y, Poulin EJ, Means AL, et al. The pan-ErbB negative regulator Lrig1 is an intestinal stem cell marker that functions as a tumor suppressor. Cell. 2012;149:146–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cheng H, Leblond CP. Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. III. Entero-endocrine cells. Am J Anatomy. 1974;141:503–19. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001410405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Barker N, Bartfeld S, Clevers H. Tissue-resident adult stem cell populations of rapidly self-renewing organs. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:656–70. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gracz AD, Magness ST. Defining hierarchies of stemness in the intestine: evidence from biomarkers and regulatory pathways. AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2014;307:G260–G73. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00066.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bjerknes M, Cheng H. Clonal analysis of mouse intestinal epithelial progenitors. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:7–14. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70222-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Barker N, van Es JH, Kuipers J, Kujala P, van den Born M, et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature. 2007;449:1003–7. doi: 10.1038/nature06196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.van der Flier LG, van Gijn ME, Hatzis P, Kujala P, Haegebarth A, et al. Transcription factor achaete scute-like 2 controls intestinal stem cell fate. Cell. 2009;136:903–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.van der Flier LG, Haegebarth A, Stange DE, van de Wetering M, Clevers H. OLFM4 is a robust marker for stem cells in human intestine and marks a subset of colorectal cancer cells. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:15–7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhu L, Gibson P, Currle DS, Tong Y, Richardson RJ, et al. Prominin 1 marks intestinal stem cells that are susceptible to neoplastic transformation. Nature. 2009;457:603–7. doi: 10.1038/nature07589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Levin TG, Powell AE, Davies PS, Silk AD, Dismuke AD, et al. Characterization of the intestinal cancer stem cell marker CD166 in the human and mouse gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:2072–82e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Muñoz J, Stange DE, Schepers AG, van de Wetering M, Koo B-K, et al. The Lgr5 intestinal stem cell signature: robust expression of proposed quiescent “+4” cell markers. The EMBO journal. 2012;31:3079–91. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fafilek B, Krausova M, Vojtechova M, Pospichalova V, Tumova L, et al. Troy, a tumor necrosis factor receptor family member, interacts with lgr5 to inhibit wnt signaling in intestinal stem cells. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:381–91. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Buczacki SJA, Zecchini HI, Nicholson AM, Russell R, Vermeulen L, et al. Intestinal label-retaining cells are secretory precursors expressing Lgr5. Nature. 2013;495:65–9. doi: 10.1038/nature11965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Barker N, Ridgway RA, van Es JH, van de Wetering M, Begthel H, et al. Crypt stem cells as the cells-of-origin of intestinal cancer. Nature. 2009;457:608–11. doi: 10.1038/nature07602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Szotek PP, Chang HL, Brennand K, Fujino A, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, et al. Normal ovarian surface epithelial label-retaining cells exhibit stem/progenitor cell characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:12469–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805012105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gamwell LF, Collins O, Vanderhyden BC. The mouse ovarian surface epithelium contains a population of LY6A (SCA-1) expressing progenitor cells that are regulated by ovulation-associated factors. Biol Reprod. 2012;87:80. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.100347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cheng CY, Hwang CI, Corney DC, Flesken-Nikitin A, Jiang L, et al. miR-34 cooperates with p53 in suppression of prostate cancer by joint regulation of stem cell compartment. Cell Rep. 2014;6:1000–7. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.02.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ng A, Tan S, Singh G, Rizk P, Swathi Y, et al. Lgr5 marks stem/progenitor cells in ovary and tubal epithelia. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:745–57. doi: 10.1038/ncb3000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Network TCGAR. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474:609–15. doi: 10.1038/nature10166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wang Y, Hayward S, Cao M, Thayer K, Cunha G. Cell differentiation lineage in the prostate. Differentiation. 2001;68:270–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2001.680414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bonkhoff H, Remberger K. Widespread distribution of nuclear androgen receptors in the basal cell layer of the normal and hyperplastic human prostate. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1993;422:35–8. doi: 10.1007/BF01605130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bonkhoff H, Stein U, Remberger K. Endocrine-paracrine cell types in the prostate and prostatic adenocarcinoma are postmitotic cells. Hum Pathol. 1995;26:167–70. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(95)90033-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sugimura Y, Cunha GR, Donjacour AA. Morphogenesis of ductal networks in the mouse prostate. Biol Reprod. 1986;34:961–71. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod34.5.961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Leong KG, Wang BE, Johnson L, Gao WQ. Generation of a prostate from a single adult stem cell. Nature. 2008;456:804–8. doi: 10.1038/nature07427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wang GM, Kovalenko B, Wilson EL, Moscatelli D. Vascular density is highest in the proximal region of the mouse prostate. Prostate. 2007;67:968–75. doi: 10.1002/pros.20582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Salm SN, Burger PE, Coetzee S, Goto K, Moscatelli D, Wilson EL. TGF-{beta} maintains dormancy of prostatic stem cells in the proximal region of ducts. J Cell Biol. 2005;170:81–90. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200412015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zhou Z, Flesken-Nikitin A, Nikitin AY. Prostate cancer associated with p53 and Rb deficiency arises from the stem/progenitor cell-enriched proximal region of prostatic ducts. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5683–90. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Xin L, Lawson DA, Witte ON. The Sca-1 cell surface marker enriches for a prostate-regenerating cell subpopulation that can initiate prostate tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:6942–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502320102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Burger PE, Xiong X, Coetzee S, Salm SN, Moscatelli D, et al. Sca-1 expression identifies stem cells in the proximal region of prostatic ducts with high capacity to reconstitute prostatic tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:7180–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502761102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Goto K, Salm SN, Coetzee S, Xiong X, Burger PE, et al. Proximal prostatic stem cells are programmed to regenerate a proximal-distal ductal axis. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1859–68. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lawson DA, Xin L, Lukacs RU, Cheng D, Witte ON. Isolation and functional characterization of murine prostate stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:181–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609684104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Cheng CY, Zhou Z, Nikitin AY. Detection and organ-specific ablation of neuroendocrine cells by synaptophysin locus-based BAC cassette in transgenic mice. PLoS One. 2013;8:e60905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Choi N, Zhang B, Zhang L, Ittmann M, Xin L. Adult murine prostate basal and luminal cells are self-sustained lineages that can both serve as targets for prostate cancer initiation. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:253–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ousset M, Van Keymeulen A, Bouvencourt G, Sharma N, Achouri Y, et al. Multipotent and unipotent progenitors contribute to prostate postnatal development. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:1131–8. doi: 10.1038/ncb2600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wang ZA, Mitrofanova A, Bergren SK, Abate-Shen C, Cardiff RD, et al. Lineage analysis of basal epithelial cells reveals their unexpected plasticity and supports a cell-of-origin model for prostate cancer heterogeneity. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15:274–83. doi: 10.1038/ncb2697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wang X, Kruithof-de Julio M, Economides KD, Walker D, Yu H, et al. A luminal epithelial stem cell that is a cell of origin for prostate cancer. Nature. 2009;461:495–500. doi: 10.1038/nature08361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Mulholland DJ, Xin L, Morim A, Lawson D, Witte O, Wu H. Lin-Sca-1+CD49fhigh stem/progenitors are tumor-initiating cells in the Pten-null prostate cancer model. Cancer Res. 2009;69:8555–62. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Dubrovska A, Kim S, Salamone RJ, Walker JR, Maira SM, et al. The role of PTEN/Akt/PI3K signaling in the maintenance and viability of prostate cancer stem-like cell populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:268–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810956106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Abou-Kheir WG, Hynes PG, Martin PL, Pierce R, Kelly K. Characterizing the contribution of stem/progenitor cells to tumorigenesis in the Pten−/−TP53−/− prostate cancer model. Stem Cells. 2010;28:2129–40. doi: 10.1002/stem.538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Tumbar T, Guasch G, Greco V, Blanpain C, Lowry WE, et al. Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin. Science. 2004;303:359–63. doi: 10.1126/science.1092436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ohyama M, Terunuma A, Tock CL, Radonovich MF, Pise-Masison CA, et al. Characterization and isolation of stem cell-enriched human hair follicle bulge cells. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:249–60. doi: 10.1172/JCI26043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Kloepper JE, Tiede S, Brinckmann J, Reinhardt DP, Meyer W, et al. Immunophenotyping of the human bulge region: the quest to define useful in situ markers for human epithelial hair follicle stem cells and their niche. Exp Dermatology. 2008;17:592–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00720.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Blanpain C, Lowry WE, Geoghegan A, Polak L, Fuchs E. Self-renewal, multipotency, and the existence of two cell populations within an epithelial stem cell niche. Cell. 2004;118:635–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Morris RJ, Liu Y, Marles L, Yang Z, Trempus C, et al. Capturing and profiling adult hair follicle stem cells. Nature Biotech. 2004;22:411–7. doi: 10.1038/nbt950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Jensen UB, Lowell S, Watt FM. The spatial relationship between stem cells and their progeny in the basal layer of human epidermis: a new view based on whole-mount labelling and lineage analysis. Development. 1999;126:2409–18. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.11.2409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Legg J, Jensen UB, Broad S, Leigh I, Watt FM. Role of melanoma chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan in patterning stem cells in human interfollicular epidermis. Development. 2003;130:6049–63. doi: 10.1242/dev.00837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Lowell S, Jones P, Le Roux I, Dunne J, Watt FM. Stimulation of human epidermal differentiation by delta-notch signalling at the boundaries of stem-cell clusters. Curr Biol. 2000;10:491–500. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00451-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Rompolas P, Mesa KR, Kawaguchi K, Park S, Gonzalez D, et al. Spatiotemporal coordination of stem cell commitment during epidermal homeostasis. Science. 2016;352:1471–4. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Clayton E, Doupe DP, Klein AM, Winton DJ, Simons BD, Jones PH. A single type of progenitor cell maintains normal epidermis. Nature. 2007;446:185–9. doi: 10.1038/nature05574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Sada A, Jacob F, Leung E, Wang S, White BS, et al. Defining the cellular lineage hierarchy in the interfollicular epidermis of adult skin. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18:619–31. doi: 10.1038/ncb3359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Horsley V, O'Carroll D, Tooze R, Ohinata Y, Saitou M, et al. Blimp1 defines a progenitor population that governs cellular input to the sebaceous gland. Cell. 2006;126:597–609. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Niemann C, Watt FM. Designer skin: lineage commitment in postnatal epidermis. Trends Cell Biol. 2002;12:185–92. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(02)02263-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Snippert HJ, Haegebarth A, Kasper M, Jaks V, van Es JH, et al. Lgr6 marks stem cells in the hair follicle that generate all cell lineages of the skin. Science. 2010;327:1385–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1184733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Brown K, Strathdee D, Bryson S, Lambie W, Balmain A. The malignant capacity of skin tumours induced by expression of a mutant H-ras transgene depends on the cell type targeted. Curr Biol. 1998;8:516–24. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70203-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.White AC, Lowry WE. Refining the role for adult stem cells as cancer cells of origin. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Osawa M. StemBook [Internet] Cambridge (MA): Harvard Stem Cell Institute; 2009. Melanocyte stem cells. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Fernandes KJL, McKenzie IA, Mill P, Smith KM, Akhavan M, et al. A dermal niche for multipotent adult skin-derived precursor cells. Nature Cell Biol. 2004;6:1082–93. doi: 10.1038/ncb1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Shih IM, Elder DE, Hsu MY, Herlyn M. Regulation of Mel-CAM/MUC18 expression on melanocytes of different stages of tumor progression by normal keratinocytes. AJPA. 1994;145:837–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Hachiya A, Kobayashi A, Yoshida Y, Kitahara T, Takema Y, Imokawa G. Biphasic expression of two paracrine melanogenic cytokines, stem cell factor and endothelin-1, in ultraviolet B-induced human melanogenesis. AJPA. 2004;165:2099–109. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63260-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Nasti TH, Timares L. Inflammasome activation of IL-1 family mediators in response to cutaneous photodamage. Photochem Photobiol. 2012;88:1111–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01182.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Okano H, Sawamoto K. Neural stem cells: involvement in adult neurogenesis and CNS repair. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 2008;363:2111–22. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.2264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Dimou L, Götz M. Glial cells as progenitors and stem cells: new roles in the healthy and diseased brain. Physiological reviews. 2014;94:709–37. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00036.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Vescovi AL, Galli R, Reynolds BA. Brain tumour stem cells. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2006;6:425–36. doi: 10.1038/nrc1889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.LeBlanc AK, Mazcko C, Brown DE, Koehler JW, Miller AD, et al. Creation of an NCI comparative brain tumor consortium: informing the translation of new knowledge from canine to human brain tumor patients. Neuro-oncology. 2016;18:1209–18. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Huse JT, Holland EC. Genetically engineered mouse models of brain cancer and the promise of preclinical testing. Brain Pathol. 2009;19:132–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00234.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Stylli SS, Luwor RB, Ware TM, Tan F, Kaye AH. Mouse models of glioma. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:619–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.McNairn AJ, Guasch G. Epithelial transition zones: merging microenvironments, niches, and cellular transformation. Eur J Dermatol. 2011;21(Suppl 2):21–8. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2011.1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.McKelvie PA, Daniell M, McNab A, Loughnan M, Santamaria JD. Squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva: a series of 26 cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:168–73. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.2.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Waring GO, 3rd, Roth AM, Ekins MB. Clinical and pathologic description of 17 cases of corneal intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;97:547–59. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90371-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Petignat P, Roy M. Diagnosis and management of cervical cancer. BMJ. 2007;335:765–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39337.615197.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Schermer A, Galvin S, Sun TT. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J Cell Biol. 1986;103:49–62. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Pellegrini G, Golisano O, Paterna P, Lambiase A, Bonini S, et al. Location and clonal analysis of stem cells and their differentiated progeny in the human ocular surface. J Cell Biol. 1999;145:769–82. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.4.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Trudgill NJ, Suvarna SK, Royds JA, Riley SA. Cell cycle regulation in patients with intestinal metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction. Mol Pathol. 2003;56:313–7. doi: 10.1136/mp.56.6.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Odze RD. Pathology of the gastroesophageal junction. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2005;22:256–65. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2006.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Runck LA, Kramer M, Ciraolo G, Lewis AG, Guasch G. Identification of epithelial label-retaining cells at the transition between the anal canal and the rectum in mice. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:3039–45. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.15.12437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Herfs M, Vargas SO, Yamamoto Y, Howitt BE, Nucci MR, et al. A novel blueprint for ‘top down’ differentiation defines the cervical squamocolumnar junction during development, reproductive life, and neoplasia. J Pathol. 2013;229:460–8. doi: 10.1002/path.4110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Herfs M, Yamamoto Y, Laury A, Wang X, Nucci MR, et al. A discrete population of squamocolumnar junction cells implicated in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:10516–21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202684109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Friedmann-Morvinski D, Bushong EA, Ke E, Soda Y, Marumoto T, et al. Dedifferentiation of neurons and astrocytes by oncogenes can induce gliomas in mice. Science. 2012;338:1080–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1226929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Schwitalla S, Fingerle AA, Cammareri P, Nebelsiek T, Goktuna SI, et al. Intestinal tumorigenesis initiated by dedifferentiation and acquisition of stem-cell-like properties. Cell. 2013;152:25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Seidman JD. Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma Localizes to the Tubal-peritoneal Junction: A Pivotal Clue to the Site of Origin of Extrauterine High-grade Serous Carcinoma (Ovarian Cancer) Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2015;34:112–20. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Schmoeckel E, Odai-Afotey AA, Schleißheimer M, Rottmann M, Flesken-Nikitin A, et al. LEF1 is preferentially expressed in the tubal-peritoneal junctions and is a reliable marker of tubal intraepithelial lesions. Modern Pathology. 2017 doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.53. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Nikitin AY, Nafus MG, Zhou Z, Liao C-P, Roy-Burman P. Prostate stem cells and cancer in animals. In: Bagley RG, Teicher BA, editors. Stem Cells and Cancer. Springer Science & Humana Press; 2009. pp. 199–216. [Google Scholar]
- 125.Kreso A, Dick JE. Evolution of the cancer stem cell model. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14:275–91. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Greaves M, Maley CC. Clonal evolution in cancer. Nature. 2012;481:306–13. doi: 10.1038/nature10762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Flesken-Nikitin A, Odai-Afotey AA, Nikitin AY. Role of the stem cell niche in the pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancers. Mol Cell Oncol. 2014;1:e963435-1–7. doi: 10.4161/23723548.2014.963435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Kaiser J. The cancer stem cell gamble. Science. 2015;347:226–9. doi: 10.1126/science.347.6219.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Rycaj K, Tang DG. Cell-of-origin of cancer versus cancer stem cells: Assays and interpretations. Cancer Res. 2015;75:4003–11. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.McGranahan N, Swanton C. Clonal Heterogeneity and Tumor Evolution: Past, Present, and the Future. Cell. 2017;168:613–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Cotsarelis G, Cheng SZ, Dong G, Sun TT, Lavker RM. Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: implications on epithelial stem cells. Cell. 1989;57:201–9. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90958-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Ksander BR, Kolovou PE, Wilson BJ, Saab KR, Guo Q, et al. ABCB5 is a limbal stem cell gene required for corneal development and repair. Nature. 2014;511:353–7. doi: 10.1038/nature13426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Ishimoto T, Oshima H, Oshima M, Kai K, Torii R, et al. CD44+ slow-cycling tumor cell expansion is triggered by cooperative actions of Wnt and prostaglandin E2 in gastric tumorigenesis. Cancer Sci. 2010;101:673–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01430.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Betton GR, Dormer CS, Wells T, Pert P. Gastric ECL-cell hyperplasia and carcinoids in rodents following chronic administration of H2-antagonists SK&F 93479 and oxmetidine and omeprazole. Tox Pathol. 1988;16:288–98. doi: 10.1177/019262338801600222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Moolenbeek C, Ruitenberg EJ. The “Swiss roll”: a simple technique for histological studies of the rodent intestine. Lab Animals. 1981;15:57–9. doi: 10.1258/002367781780958577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Shappell SB, Thomas GV, Roberts RL, Herbert R, Ittmann MM, et al. Prostate pathology of genetically engineered mice: definitions and classification. The consensus report from the Bar Harbor meeting of the Mouse Models of Human Cancer Consortium Prostate Pathology Committee. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2270–305. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-0946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Kittel B, Ruehl-Fehlert C, Morawietz G, Klapwijk J, Elwell MR, et al. Revised guides for organ sampling and trimming in rats and mice--A joint publication of the RITA and NACAD groups. Exp Tox Pathology. 2004;55:413–31. doi: 10.1078/0940-2993-00349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Latendresse JR, Warbrittion AR, Jonassen H, Creasy DM. Fixation of testes and eyes using a modified Davidson’ fluid: comparison with Bouin’s fluid and conventional Davidson’s fluid. Tox Pathol. 2002;30:524–33. doi: 10.1080/01926230290105721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Obokata H, Yamato M, Tsuneda S, Okano T. Reproducible subcutaneous transplantation of cell sheets into recipient mice. Nature Protocols. 2011;6:1053–9. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




