Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 19;24(1):159–165. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izx009

Table 2.

Test Phase Using Single Assays for UC (n = 21) vs CC (n = 12)

miRNA P * FDR Fold Change AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI), % Specificity (95% CI), % Accuracy (95% CI), %
let-7d 0.361 0.615 1.654 0.67 (0.53–0.81) 61.9 (46.8–75) 75.0 (54.8–88.3) 66.7 (54.6–76.9)
miR-101 0.541 0.659 1.220 0.63 (0.50–0.76) 52.4 (37.7–66.6) 79.2 (59.1–91.2) 62.1 (50.0–72.9)
miR-22 0.659 0.659 0.856 0.44 (0.30–0.58) 73.8 (58.8–84.8) 100 (83.7–100) 47.0 (35.4–58.8)
miR-576-3p 0.596 0.659 1.351 0.66 (0.52–0.80) 64.3 (49.1–77.1) 79.2 (59.1–91.2) 69.7 (57.7–79.5)
miR-598 0.013 0.054 1.831 0.67 (0.54–0.80) 69.0 (53.9–81) 62.5 (42.6–78.9) 66.7 (54.6–76.9)
miR-642 0.005 0.040 4.327 0.69 (0.56–0.82) 73.8 (58.8–84.8) 66.7 (46.6–82.2) 71.2 (59.3–80.8)
miR-744 0.172 0.458 1.598 0.61 (0.48–0.75) 35.7 (22.9–50.9) 95.8 (78.1–100) 57.6 (45.6–68.8)

Each reaction was performed in duplicate. miRNAs that were found to be significantly different are depicted in boldface.

*Student t test.

False discovery rate, α = 0.05.

Comparative ΔCT method (2-ΔΔCT).