Table 1.
Property | FDA PRO Guidance Recommendations |
---|---|
Conceptual framework | Should be confirmed by using empirical evidence during instrument development |
Explicit statement of relationship among instruments’ concepts, domains, and items | |
Response options should be clear and appropriate. | |
Reliability | Instrument should demonstrate test-retest reliability. |
Instrument should demonstrate internal consistency. | |
Content validity | Must encompass most important and comprehensive outcomes for patients |
Patient input should be sought for item generation. | |
Patient input should be sought until point of saturation. | |
Construct validity | Obtained results should be consistent with preexisting hypotheses. |
Instrument should have the ability to differentiate between clinically distinct groups. | |
Clinical relevance of score changes | Instrument should be equally sensitive to gains and losses in health status. |
Instrument should be sensitive to change at all points for the clinical population. |
Abbreviations: FDA, Food and Drug Administration; PRO, patient-reported outcome.