Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 14;15(2):340. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020340

Table 5.

Logistic regression models of FMD adjusting for region, population and housing density, household income, and race.

Adjusted Odds Ratio 95% CI 95% CI
Lower CI Lower CI
(Intercept) 0.0016 ** 0.0000 0.0000
%Forest 1.0132 0.9917 0.9917
Forest-Edge contrast index 0.9619 ** 0.9371 0.9371
Shrubland-Patch area 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
Shrubland-Edge contrast index 1.0068 0.9595 0.9595
Shrubland-Euclidean distance 1.0027 *** 1.0016 1.0016
Shrubland-Cohesion index 1.0751 ** 1.0194 1.0194
%Herbaceous 0.9957 0.9347 0.9347
Herbaceous-Patch density 1.2880 0.8612 0.8612
Ecoregion Midwest Referent
Northeast 1.0288 0.3255 3.2753
Southeast 1.9631 0.6698 5.8683
Southwest 0.0088 *** 0.0009 0.0666
West 0.0453 ** 0.0053 0.3155
Population Density DL
Housing Density 0.9990 0.9965 1.0014
Median Household Income 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
%Non-White 1.0330 * 1.0063 1.0623

Pseudo-R2 (McFadden) = 0.365; Significance level: * indicates p <0.05, ** indicates p < 0.01, and *** indicates p < 0.001; DL: deleted from the model due to a GVIF > 2.