Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 15;15(2):344. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020344

Table 8.

The indirect effects testing results of the mediation model.

Model Variables Unstandardized Estimate Standardized Estimate Bootstrapping
Bias-Corrected 95% CI
Lower 2.5% Upper 2.5%
Total Sample (n = 327)
WFC-POS-PC Influence paths
WFC→POS (a) −0.247 −0.224 −0.524 −0.056
POS→PC (b) 0.826 0.811 0.517 1.261
WFC→PC −0.054 −0.048 −0.252 0.190
Indirect effect
a × b −0.204 - −0.509 −0.048
χ2/df = 2.768; CFI = 0.870; TLI = 0.849; RMSEA = 0.074; SRMR = 0.062.
Male Sample (n = 219)
WFC-POS-PC Influence paths
WFC→POS (a) −0.696 −0.450 −1.214 −0.359
POS→PC (b) 0.417 0.802 0.227 0.777
WFC→PC 0.046 0.057 −0.199 0.265
Indirect effect
a × b −0.290 - −0.645 −0.124
χ2/df = 2.191; CFI = 0.856; TLI = 0.833; RMSEA = 0.074; SRMR = 0.073.

Note: WFC: Work-family conflict; POS: Perceived organizational support; PC: Professional commitment. χ2: Chi-square; df: Degree of freedom; CFI: comparative fit index; TLI: Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA: Root mean square error of approximation; SRMR: Standardized root mean square residual.