Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 15;15(2):344. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020344

Table 9.

The direct effects testing results of multiple mediation models.

Models Variables Unstandardized Estimate Standardized Estimate Bootstrapping
Bias-Corrected 95% CI
Lower 2.5% Upper 2.5%
TC-POS-PC Influence paths
TC→ES (a1) −0.173 −0.148 −0.397 0.029
TC→IS (a2) −0.335 −0.229 −0.622 −0.115
ES→PC (b1) 0.538 0.632 0.375 0.750
IS→PC (b2) 0.120 0.176 −0.015 0.272
TC→PC −0.155 −0.156 −0.323 −0.004
Indirect effect
a1 × b1 −0.093 - −0.236 0.010
a2 × b2 −0.040 - −0.129 0.000
SC-POS-PC Influence paths
SC→ES (a4) −0.147 −0.187 −0.338 −0.014
SC→IS (a5) −0.281 −0.288 −0.446 −0.114
ES→PC (b4) 0.539 0.658 0.369 0.751
IS→PC (b5) 0.158 0.238 0.012 0.323
SC→PC 0.065 0.101 −0.059 0.163
Indirect effect
a4 × b4 −0.079 - −0.205 −0.011
a5 × b5 −0.044 - −0.114 −0.009
BC-POS-PC Influence paths
BC→ES (a7) −0.107 −0.106 −0.241 0.033
BC→IS (a8) −0.068 −0.068 −0.229 0.149
ES→PC (b7) 0.536 0.464 0.382 0.707
IS→PC (b8) 0.164 0.141 0.015 0.307
BC→PC −0.115 −0.099 −0.302 0.006
Indirect effect
a7 × b7 −0.057 - −0.142 0.014
a8 × b8 −0.011 - −0.058 0.016

Note: TC: Time-based work-family conflict; SC: Strain-based work-family conflict; BC: Behavior-based work-family conflict; POS: Perceived organizational support; ES: Emotional support; IS: Instrumental support; PC: Professional commitment.