. 2018 Feb 22;15(2):375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020375

Table 2.

Summary of two-factor ANOVA of movement speed (log transformation) ^a.

Effect	F	p	η_p²	Treatment (n/N) ^b	Mean (SD)	Mean Diff.	95% Conf. Int. for Diff.		Post-hoc
Effect	F	p	η_p²	Treatment (n/N) ^b	Mean (SD)	Mean Diff.	Lower Bound	Upper Bound	Post-hoc
Treatment ^c × Social interaction ^d	1.810	0.170	0.039	I (33/95)	−1.254 (0.337)	I−II I−III II−III	−0.950 −0.946 −0.154	−0.639 −0.635 0.162	I < II, III (p = 0.000)
Treatment ^c × Social interaction ^d	1.810	0.170	0.039	II (31/95)	−4.598 (0.246)
Treatment (I, II, III)	94.590	0.000 ***	0.680	II (31/95)	−4.598 (0.246)
Treatment (I, II, III)	94.590	0.000 ***	0.680	III (31/95)	−4.639 (0.141)
Social interaction (Presence of partners)	0.097	0.757	0.001	Yes (39/95)	−0.715 (0.368)
Social interaction (Presence of partners)	0.097	0.757	0.001	No (56)	−0.753 (0.511)

^a The interaction between experimental treatment and social interaction is accounted for. ^b N denotes the total number of participants (95 excluding partners), whereas n denotes the number of those in the subpopulation (excluding partners). ^c I denotes Level 1 green exercise; II denotes Level 2 green exercise, and III denotes Level 3 green exercise. ^d Social interaction denotes the presence of partners. *** denotes significance level at 0.001.