Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 21;90(1077):20170240. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170240

Table 3.

Image noise (standard deviation of HU), DLP, effective dose and subjective image quality score according to anatomic location

Location Dose Imagenoise DLPa Effective dose (mSvb) Image quality (score, reader 1) Image quality (score, reader 2)
Shoulder Standard dose 62.7 (±15) 404 (±167) 5.8 (±2.3) 3.69 (±0.5) 3.71 (±0.5)
Low dose 64.1 (±18) 199 (±78) 2.9 (±1.1) 3.78 (±0.4) 3.78 (±0.4)
p value 0.77 <0.001 <0.001 0.37 0.40
Pelvis Standard dose 73.4 (±22) 492 (±190) 7.4 (±2.9) 3.78 (±0.4) 3.77 (±0.4)
Low dose 69.2 (±23) 247 (±59) 3.9 (±1.6) 3.76 (±0.5) 3.82 (±0.4)
p value 0.41 <0.001 <0.001 0.93 0.48
Ankle Standard dose 94.1 (±29) 229 (±90) 1.4 (±0.5) 3.60 (±0.5) 3.65 (±0.5)
Low dose 81.6 (±24) 136 (±46) 0.8 (±0.3) 3.60 (±0.7) 3.64 (±0.6)
p value 0.45 <0.001 <0.001 0.73 0.94
Wrist Standard dose 78.0 (±27) 202 (±31) 1.2 (±0.2) 3.86 (±0.5) 3.88 (±0.4)
Low dose 67.7 (±27) 116 (±10) 0.7 (±0.1) 3.80 (±0.5) 3.75 (±0.5)
p value 0.40 <0.001 <0.001 0.21 0.08

Note: Data in parentheses are standard deviations.

DLP, dose length product; HU, Hounsfield unit.

a

DAP, Dose area product

b

mSv, milli-Sievert