Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 13;33(4):683–696. doi: 10.1007/s00467-017-3841-y

Table 3.

Effect of different formulas at their recommended time points

Formula Mean bias (GFR1p − GFR7p) Proportion of measures within x% of reference method (95% CI)a P valuea
Time (h) r Bias Limits of agreement P5 P10 P15 P20
% of measures 95% CI % of measures 95% CI % of measures 95% CI % of measures 95% CI
GFR1p-Fleming 2 0.99 − 1.8 − 12.3 to 8.8 54 44–64 79 70–86 86 78–92 90 82–94 0.42
3 0.98 − 1.5 − 13.5 to 10.5 56 46–66 82 73–89 89 81–93 91 83–95 N/A
3.5 0.98 0.1 − 12.4 to 12.5 44 35–54 81 72–88 87 79–93 89 82–94 0.51
4 0.98 1.5 − 12.4 to 15.4 41 31–51 75 65–83 90 82–94 92 84–96 0.10
GFR1p-Ham&Piepz 2 0.98 4.1 − 11.0 to 19.2 42 32–52 64 54–72 73 63–81 76 67–83 < 0.001
GFR1p-Groth&Aasted 2 0.98 3.6 − 9.2 to 16.3 35 27–45 65 55–73 75 65–83 81 72–88 < 0.001
GFR1p-Stake 3 0.97 5.8 − 16.2 to 27.8 33 25–3 66 56–74 78 69–85 82 73–89) 0.002
GFR1p-Jacobsson 2 0.97 − 1.6 − 26.0 to 22.8 32 24–42 58 48–68 69 59–77 78 69–85 < .001
3 0.98 1.0 − 17.7 to 19.7 34 26–44 58 48–68 74 64–82 81 72–88 < .001
3.5 0.98 2.2 − 14.6 to 19.0 27 19–37 64 54–73 75 65–82 82 73–89 < .001
4 0.98 2.6 − 14.6 to 19.8 32 24–42 65 55–73 76 67–83 88 79–93 < .001
5 0.98 1.9 − 12.5 to 16.3 43 33–53 72 62–80 85 77–91 91 83–95 0.04
GFR1p-Jacobsson-mod. 2 0.97 − 0.5 − 24.3 to 23.2 33 25–43 61 51–71 70 60–78 78 69–85 < 0.001
3 0.98 0.2 − 16.7 to 17.1 35 27–45 69 59–77 75 65–83 84 76–90 0.003
3.5 0.98 0.8 − 14.1 to 15.7 41 32–51 65 55–74 80 71–87 88 80–93 < 0.001
4 0.98 0.8 − 14.5 to 16.1 42 32–52 71 61–79 85 77–91 91 83–95 0.02
5 0.98 − 0.4 − 13.8 to 13.0 50 40–60 74 64–82 90 82–94 94 87–97 0.08
GFR2p-JBM 2 and 5 0.99 − 1.7 − 9.4 to 6.1 73 63–81 97 97–99 100 96–100 100 96–100 < 0.001

Evaluation of optimal time for blood sampling was investigated using five different sampling time points after iohexol injection, namely 2, 3, 3.5, 4 and 5 h. glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (mL/min/1.73m2) was estimated by one-point methods at time points recommended in the original publications (n = 96 for all time points except for 3.5 h, where n = 95) and by the reference method (GFR7p). Mean bias, 95% limits of agreement and correlation (r) with reference method are shown calculated. For comparison the two-point method of Jødal Brøchner Mortensen (GFR2p-JBM) was added

N/A, Not applicable

aEstimated accuracy is shown as P5, P10, P15 and P20, namely, the percentage of patients within ± 5, 10, 15 and 20% of the reference method, respectively, along with 95% confidence intervals (CI)

bComparison with Fleming P10 at 3 h