Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 19;9:1133. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03475-7

Table 2.

Comparison of Cas9–HE and Cas9 in obtaining targeted transgene integration into the rat Rosa26 and Il22bp loci

Cas9 form Target locus KI fragments Dose Cas9 mRNA/sgRNA/donor DNA (ng/µl) Eggs injected (survival rate %) Eggs transferred E14 embryos (% transferred) Indels + (% of E14) Donor integration+ (% of E14) HDR+ (% of E14)
Cas9–HE Rosa26 CAG-GFP 50/10/2 216 (75%) 154 37 (24%) 29 (78%) 5 (13%) 3 (8%)
Cas9 Rosa26 CAG-GFP 50/10/2 284 (77%) 211 84 (39%) 62 (73%) 2 (2%) 1 (1%)
Cas9–HE Il22bp Il22bp-2A-GFP 50/10/2 277 (78%) 217 82 (37%) 45 (55%) 7 (8%) 2 (2%)
Cas9 Il22bp Il22bp-2A-GFP 50/10/2 286 (80%) 226 91 (40%) 55 (60%) 8 (8%) 4 (4%)

HDR+, HDR-mediated GFP transgene integration was defined as positive in E14 embryos for which both 5′ and 3′ in–out PCRs were detected using primers in the transgene and outside the homology arms (with PCR products confirmed by DNA sequencing, schematic of PCR primer positions in Supplementary Fig. 5); indels+, E14 embryos in which indels were detected by sequencing of PCR amplicons from the targeted genomic region; donor integration, E14 embryos in which PCR amplification of the transgene was positive